Why doesn't POE have mounts?

We really don't need mounts in a game with so many ways to get around already and how far apart mob packs are.

Companions would be nice, however. Just a kawaii little cloud following you around giving passive bonuses like +420% swag and and occasionally makin' it rain on dem hoes.
Ugh effort
This is brilliant, also i love the amount of people taking this serious :D
PN: Haegar_der_Schreckliche
"
ivqancorp wrote:
Thank you for taking a serious thread on a subject which could possibly improve the game, either in the form of a ride-able mount or a pet mount which can provide other benefits like loot pick up, and turning it into a troll fest.

POE lives up to its reputation.


then perhaps you are not at all familiar with the lore of wreaclast. Here is a nifty tidpit of wizdom.

did you know pants was invented largely to prevent chaffing while riding horses ? the cultures in wreaclast don't have horses or mounts for that matter hence no pants.

so no mounts make no sense in this game, we have waypoints , the ability to teleport , move at 60 miles an hour and quite literally leap tall buildings in a single bound.

what good would a mount do here?
Idk. cook a horse for dinner?
Ugh effort
"
ivqancorp wrote:

Some of the advantages of introducing mounts:

1) More money for GGG
2) Increase in player base as many players from games like World of Tanks will come over to POE
3) Faster travel time in maps
4) Looking cool, something to tell all your friends and co-workers about
5) Give mounts armor, more slots to fill and therefor creating more depth to the game
6) Can name mounts, and thus creates a sense of attachment to the game; like a doggy
7) Opens the path for flying mounts later, and again more money for GGG to improve the game
8) Could expand on this and give your mount its own passive skill tree, again more depth
9) Mount of the week series, creating more PR for GGG
10) And lastly, introduction of new race(s) in game means more lore about the mounts


I don't know why, but people are (purposefully or not) ignoring 90% of the original poster's idea and turning it into the one dimensional "yet another mechanism for moving fast - stupid idea".

I am in no way claiming that the original post is well written (sorry OP, it's not), but just because the term "mount" means something to you within certain contexts does not mean it has to be restricted to whatever you want it to be restricted to. The possibilities are endless and the actual implementation by GGG could turn out to be great.

Stop turning the original poster's idea into a strawman just so that you can make fun of it. It's not constructive.
"
wookie919 wrote:
"
ivqancorp wrote:

Some of the advantages of introducing mounts:

1) More money for GGG
2) Increase in player base as many players from games like World of Tanks will come over to POE
3) Faster travel time in maps
4) Looking cool, something to tell all your friends and co-workers about
5) Give mounts armor, more slots to fill and therefor creating more depth to the game
6) Can name mounts, and thus creates a sense of attachment to the game; like a doggy
7) Opens the path for flying mounts later, and again more money for GGG to improve the game
8) Could expand on this and give your mount its own passive skill tree, again more depth
9) Mount of the week series, creating more PR for GGG
10) And lastly, introduction of new race(s) in game means more lore about the mounts


I don't know why, but people are (purposefully or not) ignoring 90% of the original poster's idea and turning it into the one dimensional "yet another mechanism for moving fast - stupid idea".

I am in no way claiming that the original post is well written (sorry OP, it's not), but just because the term "mount" means something to you within certain contexts does not mean it has to be restricted to whatever you want it to be restricted to. The possibilities are endless and the actual implementation by GGG could turn out to be great.

Stop turning the original poster's idea into a strawman just so that you can make fun of it. It's not constructive.


I will humor this out of boredom.

1 mtx and supporter packs already do that
2 doubtful, wow actually has maps large enough to warrant a mount, poe does not.
3 pay to win ( i can stop here but what ever since the op framed mounts as things you buy with money in reason 1) extra ms would be a balance issue as it would stack with the PLENTY of other methods to gain ms.. and it would be op.
4 pets do that already
5 pay to win again
6 pointless
7 the game engine clearly does not support this , cmon man did you even read this?
8 oh god the current one isnt enough ?
9 .........
10 now i remeber why people started to troll this thread.

satisfied?

Last edited by Saltychipmunk#1430 on Mar 25, 2015, 1:33:32 PM
The definitive "does not merit a response" question. Therefore, pages of responses.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Would these be something you mount, or something that mounts you?

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info