I'd prefer PoE to be P2P if we could have a better quality game.

Well it already kinda is, it is just that you dont pay to GGG to win.

But I really do not think at this point PoE quality is dependent on cash flow. It is more about design decisions.
If Poe is p2p , it will be desert. End of story.
I would P2P on the sole fact I can mod offline version of this game and run servers for my friends.
"
CharanJaydemyr wrote:
"
ilieff1 wrote:
If Poe is p2p , it will be desert. End of story.


Uhm, no. CB had a very healthy population and made plenty of money. And it was a far inferior version of the game.

GGG spoilt their gamers and it shows. People just don't appreciate things they get for free.

It depends what the OP means by p2p. I have always taken it as referring to the subscription model. The standard model of pay once and play as much as you like(which is how PoE was in closed beta) doesn't really have a name so far as I know.
"
Vesuvius079 wrote:

It depends what the OP means by p2p. I have always taken it as referring to the subscription model. The standard model of pay once and play as much as you like(which is how PoE was in closed beta) doesn't really have a name so far as I know.


I think that's Buy to Play B2P, is it not?
Casually casual.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info