I may be a different kind of genius - not even I am ready to accept it.

"

Lachdanan wrote:

I see, you´re rattling with the sabers but i would guess the answer is obvoious for a member of the Apathy Guild of Wreaclast.

Why do we compare boxes yet again ?
Leave the box where it is and enjoy it, maybe play and manipulate it a little bit ^^ *evilsnicker*

This is not a war between our insanity - this is a reason to behold; a moment to share, to remember the Universe as a whole, and not as something that surrounds us. Playing mind games is ambitious, but ambition is just the result of hunger and consumption from not having anything after realizing it's all vibration, frequency and energy.

I agree,
meanwhile i fetched myself a cherry-yoghourt and came to the conclusion that there is a tiny chance that actually MoonYu (our famous Cherrypicker) could have had his fingers in my food.

"

Lachdanan wrote:

I agree,
meanwhile i fetched myself a cherry-yoghourt and came to the conclusion that there is a tiny chance that actually MoonYu (our famous Cherrypicker) could have had his fingers in my food.

Geniuses have one thing in common - they are communicated to through the Universe in ways such as Albert Einstein coming up with an innovative idea from daydreaming.

I have been borne through nature, and raised by night terrors. The wisdom I have came from my dreams, and the voices that ebb in and out. The questions I've asked the monsters and creatures within those fractal states is why I am a genius. If you read Jung's works on dreams and shadow archetypes, you'll see that he specifically writes how it would take someone to have the bravery to wrestle with the demons at the pit of hell (metaphor) to communicate with the shadow archetype (in other words, I have faced all of my fears).

Some people have a "stroke of genius" - for me and other great minds, we are living that every day.

Most of philosophy seems pretty dumb to me today. It had its use before the ages of discovery and reason, but I mostly view it as pointless debate about things that philosophers simply don't understand in the first place.

"

bhavv wrote:

Most of philosophy seems pretty dumb to me today. It had its use before the ages of discovery and reason, but I mostly view it as pointless debate about things that philosophers simply don't understand in the first place.

Philosophy can't be anything more or less than itself. It's people that are making it harder to appreciate.

"

bhavv wrote:

Most of philosophy seems pretty dumb to me today. It had its use before the ages of discovery and reason, but I mostly view it as pointless debate about things that philosophers simply don't understand in the first place.

Philosophy is the art of wild speculation. It can be a fun topic of discussion, or something to think about from time to time, but the fact is that we -- as beings of limited knowledge and an even more limited understanding -- can only theorize based on that limited collective knowledge. It's like a baby trying to learn the intricacies of molecular physics; the baby must first grow up and develop a foundation of knowledge before it can tackle complex ideas.

"

Mephasm wrote:

can only theorize based on that limited collective knowledge.

Where does that knowledge come from? The Universe. We're speaking the cosmic tongue, in spite of neglecting our cosmic tools.

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

*eye roll*

In all my time online, I've never read anyone so consistently condescending, nor anyone less warranted to behave in such a manner.

Even if it's all one big facade, some part of you actually believes you're this superior to others. And that's just a little tragic.

My one remaining hope for you is that someday you get over yourself, because you'll be a lot happier and who knows, maybe I might even be able to have a normal, amiable and even fruitful conversation with you without feeling like my brain is being used for dental floss by a drooling giant with unusually small shoulders.

Do not mistake pity and incredulity for anger. Anger results from beliefs being challenged. You'd have to remember how to talk to other people to do that.

I have not mistaken your pity for anger - to pity, one must judge and admit to playing god. I am a void - I have built my entire life around nothing; I have never felt whole before taking this reality in as an ephemeral mirage of my own self-proclaimed desires mistakingly cherry-picked out of my collective consciousness. It is you that must oppose me because my life's work opposes your means to devour and compensate for your infinities of natural and cosmic emptyness. Your unreasonably large vocabulary tells a tale of a hungry beast that will cease not their actions for the petty drop of invigoration.

I am an enemy to your hunger - I don't feed; for I am always free.