BECAREFULL -name edited- IS A FKING CROUK

Dang, what is more concerning to me is how a self proclaimed "noob" even has 5 exalts to spend. I have been playing since day 1 of open beta and I've only found maybe 4 exalts in total. I've found quite a few low value uniques though. How do "noobs" amass so much currency?

"

spadrus wrote:

I am a complete fool.

Dumbass. Good on the dude for teaching you a lesson about Wraeclast.

GGG gave you all the tools not to be an idiot but you still managed to work your way around it. Rename your thread please to: "Be careful, "spadrus" is a complete tool".

Yay, a name and shame thread I got to comment on b4 lock lol...

dang, whats more sad is the mentality of this gay ass community. They rush to defend the scammer before the scammed. lmfao.

"

pianokingx3 wrote:

dang, whats more sad is the mentality of this gay ass community. They rush to defend the scammer before the scammed. lmfao.

Yay, another dumbass. No one's DEFENDING the scammer, they're defending the OBVIOUS policy that is required. How do you know the named dude is actually a scammer and this dude isn't a troll shaming him for no reason?

No one is rushing to defend anyone. People are simply rushing to attack. Yes, one can blindly attack without defending--on the internet, it's usually called "flaming" or "trolling" depending on the context.

Still awaiting lockdown.

"

mkmaddage wrote:

"

pianokingx3 wrote:

dang, whats more sad is the mentality of this gay ass community. They rush to defend the scammer before the scammed. lmfao.

Yay, another dumbass. No one's DEFENDING the scammer, they're defending the OBVIOUS policy that is required. How do you know the named dude is actually a scammer and this dude isn't a troll shaming him for no reason?

And that makes me wonder why we even have Name and Shame policy... For some reason my name haven't been brought up in scammer threads. Maybe because I don't scam? -_-

Name and Shame policy needs to be removed.

"

pianokingx3 wrote:

dang, whats more sad is the mentality of this gay ass community. They rush to defend the scammer before the scammed. lmfao.

No one is defending the scammer.

There are mechanisms in place that will stop you from getting scammed like this.

Scammers would not scam if people paid attention. Why on earth you would do a high-value trade and not pay attention to what's being traded is beyond my capacity to comprehend.

"

Sikab wrote:

"

mkmaddage wrote:

"

pianokingx3 wrote:

dang, whats more sad is the mentality of this gay ass community. They rush to defend the scammer before the scammed. lmfao.

Yay, another dumbass. No one's DEFENDING the scammer, they're defending the OBVIOUS policy that is required. How do you know the named dude is actually a scammer and this dude isn't a troll shaming him for no reason?

And that makes me wonder why we even have Name and Shame policy... For some reason my name haven't been brought up in scammer threads. Maybe because I don't scam? -_-

Name and Shame policy needs to be removed.

Oh shit AMAZING point dude. So, if YOU haven't been named then the whole thing is pointless? /internets.

"

mkmaddage wrote:

Oh shit AMAZING point dude. So, if YOU haven't been named then the whole thing is pointless? /internets.

No... but in controled environment Scammer List could work. With proper evidence attached to the reports would solve the false naming.

"

Sikab wrote:

No... but in controled environment Scammer List could work. With proper evidence attached to the reports would solve the false naming.

Fair call - from one perspective. There shouldn't be any reports in the first place though. There is a system there to stop anyone being scammed.