Why are historical events that are taught in schools to 8 year olds too offensive to post about?

I'm gonna do it... Here goes... Mods watch out...
Spoiler
Voldemort
Oblivious
Last edited by Disrupted on May 21, 2017, 10:05:43 PM
"
鬼殺し wrote:
"
bhavv wrote:


And why should a historical name / depiction of the name not be allowed?


Because said name is now used well beyond the labeling of one history person. It's almost a common noun now.


Oh nein u didnt.
(b) Personal abuse, foul language, inappropriate subject matter, obscene, harassing, threatening, hateful, or discriminatory or defamatory remarks of any nature ... are not permitted.

- PoE TOS.
"
bhavv wrote:
Should mentioning other historical figures such as Stalin or Mao also be considered offensive? How abut Alexander the Great who also killed quite a lot of people?

Nothing should be offensive to talk about. All historical figures should be properly debated - truthfuly in line with their kill ratio, in which Stalin & Mao lead everyone by far.

Yet leftist still aren't ashamed to fly hammer&sickle flags. Which proves the bias and failure of education in western countries.
When night falls
She cloaks the world
In impenetrable darkness

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info