Multiple Golems?
So lets say I want to create a very tanky spell caster. I get Liege of the Primordial for the +1 Golem, and then I get a Clayshaper for an additional +1 Golem.
If I were to make 2-3 of those Chaos Golems, socketed in a +2 level to gems item, would I be getting an additional 10-15% physical mitigation (at lv 20). I say 2-3 because I might want to use one for an actual elemental golem to get the 100% increased effect as well as the 40% increased damage from Liege as it doesn't effect Chaos and Stone Golems. Last bumped on Jun 28, 2016, 7:30:06 PM
| |
Golem buffs do not stack with themselves. 2 chaos golems is the same as 1 chaos golem (except that you also get the extra minion).
This is the same as all other auras and buffs in the game; only 1 of the exact same type can apply to you at any moment. Last edited by codetaku on Jun 28, 2016, 12:27:02 PM
| |
Golem buffs of the same type do not stack, so having multiple Chaos golems will not grant you more than the usual 3-4% phys damage reduction. You can, however, have golems of different types to receive different buffs (i.e. a flame golem and a chaos golem will grant you increased damage and physical damage reduction).
Former player moderator, valued poster, and early-adopter responsible for The Blood Dance. GGG has forgotten where they came from. As a result, I no longer support the deceitful, corporate Tencent slave sellouts running this game. Last edited by MonopolyLegend on Jun 28, 2016, 12:27:00 PM
|
|
I had a sneaking suspicion that was the case. Thanks for the replies. It would be nice if that stacked lol 4 chaos Golems, at lv 22 would be a 20% phys reduction. But for balance sake that makes sense.
| |
It's not actually the golem giving the buff, you get the buff for having the golem.
It still works with Ichimonji, f.Ex. You can try to get a helmet enchant for your chaos golem, though. Zaanus:
Global chat: Mechanics for A work one way, B for another, C for a third but also with A, B uses C but not A, and D uses A&B but not C ___ Isn't a "no" better than an ignore? |
|