Donald Trump
|
https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/801805498991288320
https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/801811923276890112 That s**t makes me sick in my stomach... |
|
" The first one is a witty comeback, noice. The second one is probably made up. GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
|
" >buzzfeed https://www.buzzfeed.com/remeepatel/xx-things-you-know-if-youre-a-girl-who-loves-to-poo?utm_term=.mcKKxWbzQa#.iq507EVGkO Oblivious
|
|
" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem |
|
|
stupid idea to use machines at elections...
http://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/38099842 (Putin with a "joke") Now before anyone comes up with the usual simple but stupid comment like "you just don´t like the result" - I don´t, but I accept any democratic result, ask yourself if you care about that. Another simple but stupid comment would be:"the machines are not connected to the internet", yes, you would need people with access to them. To be honest I think Trump fans are like Trump, "accept the result - if I win"... From what I see here, it seems hard to find any evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss2fPvXBd7Y ("Cylance Discloses Voting Machine Vulnerability") It doesn´t matter if this type was used or another, I´m sure any of them can be manipulated somehow. |
|
" КГБ Putin doesn't need the Internet to rig US elections, he sends sexy agents. Trump is especially vulnerable for beautiful women, so watch out, all your borders could belong to Putin now. --- The numbers are in: Trump wins Michigan by 10,704 It seems leftist politicians once again scammed people for some easy moniez :) When night falls
She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness |
|
" The degree of vulnerability likely varies with the machine, but with physical access for a period of time, just about any device is vulnerable - voting machine or otherwise. Those with a paper trail are more difficult to reconcile an altered result, which is likely why Hillary could only rig the vote against Bernie in places without a paper audit. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mLpCEIGEYGYl9RZWFRcmpsZk0/view?pref=2&pli=1 "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910 |
|
" But there´s a lot of experience in Russia and China. Moving data to gain global influence is cheaper than moving armies: http://uatoday.tv/crime/russians-use-same-ip-address-for-hacker-attacks-on-us-ukraine-germany-threatconnect-739500.html " Cheap one. Stein probably wants her own - green colored - jet with a golden STEIN logo, otherwise she doesn´t feel important enough, right... :-P . Sure, whatever. I know some billionaire with good contacts to Russia and enterprises all over the world who will get so much richer as a president. Hint: I´m not talking about Putin or Erdogan. Hint 2: He says he doesn´t want any money for his job as a president. Now - THAT´s a good joke. @Dalai: The whole preference for Clinton was a huge strategic error by the democrats as I see it from afar. Last edited by Schmodderhengst#7293 on Nov 25, 2016, 9:00:50 AM
|
|
" The US have been spying on everyone (even their western allies) for ages, not only for the purpose of industrial espionage & gaining political influence, but also actively involving themselves in cyberwarfare (Stuxnet, Iran). While at the same time destroying the middle east with actual armies. So spare me your UkropToday "bad Putin" narrative... When night falls She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness Last edited by morbo#1824 on Nov 25, 2016, 8:55:14 AM
|
|
" I know, doesn´t make it better. Devaluating the source doesn´t change what happened. As for the German part - our secret services came to the conclusion that Russia hacked our parliament last year. Stuxnet was probably a better alternative than bombing nuclear facilities or killing more Iranian scientists (Mossad ?). Sending troops to the middle east was a really bad idea in the first place. I agree with you. |
|
