Is empower REALLY + to gem levels?
" Turns out it won't be an end-all gem even for all spells. When you level up your gem 2 levels, from 18 to 20* these skills gain this much more** damage: Elemental hit: 19,7% Spark - 21%% Fireball - 19,8% FP - 16,7% Incinerate - 18,8% Arc - 21,2% There, not stellar but certainly not bad for only 25% more cost. However, empower will be a pain to level and you usually have more appealing options for most spells. For those with less options it will be great, for example Arc, Shock/Frost Nova, Firestorm... * level 20 to 22 actually gets a tiny bit less as gain per level steadily drops off in later levels, for example fireball gets 34% more for levels 12-14 and 91% more for levelling it 6-8. Fortunately we won't be able to use the gem at low or mid levels, that would trivialize them just like Searing Touch does. ** it's really more damage, base gets modified. Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs. ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]► ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]► Last edited by raics#7540 on Sep 6, 2013, 11:14:35 AM
|
![]() |
Purity is 24.8% mana reserved with Alphas, and 18.9% life reserved with Prism, with mana reservation nodes and an empowered Reduced Mana. Or 31.7% mana reserved / 25.8% life reserved without the mana reservation nodes. That provides a +6% max res with IF. Assume Alphas, add EA, Saffell's, and Divination Distillate to the mix, and you're looking at 94% max all res. Also assume an easy 50-75% spellblock with Saffell's and spells don't do diddly shit to you.
This is the only case where my power creep senses tingle, and I don't like the idea of empower. Everywhere else it looks fun as hell, especially as one of only a few viable supports for Arc. Level 25 Arc with level 23 supports? The spell might actually work now! Edit: It's just too bad Empower can't empower Empower, that'd be funny. Infinitely recursive +1 skill levels? luls. Devolving Wilds Land “T, Sacrifice Devolving Wilds: Search your library for a basic land card and reveal it. Then shuffle your library.” Last edited by CanHasPants#3515 on Sep 6, 2013, 11:14:40 AM
|
![]() |
" WHAT IN THE SEVEN HELLS? Don't tell me +1 to all gems works with Empower. That's severely broken, I had full confidence they won't make such a stupid oversight. I hate exceptions but even that is better than this. Wish the armchair developers would go back to developing armchairs. ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]► ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]► Last edited by raics#7540 on Sep 6, 2013, 11:18:32 AM
|
![]() |
+1 gems works with empower, that's why Empower has a max level of 3, which gives +2 to supported gems
So with +1 to all gems, and maxed empower, you would get +3 to all gems. With a +2 to cold on an item for instance, you would end up with +5 to level of cold gems and +3 to level of all gems Not bad. basically, you can't use +1 all gems to boost the Empower bonus beyond +2. it's capped. Last edited by tikitaki#3010 on Sep 6, 2013, 11:22:59 AM
|
![]() |
It says +1 to ACTIVE skill gems, so it wont boost support gems
its not really that powerful, but should be good with some spells and with traps Dogs Summoner - http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/885199
|
![]() |
I wonder if a a level 3 empower in a +level gem item becomes level 4 and gives +3 levels.
Because Righteous fire users with a +2/+1 offhand really needed 3 more levels on righteous fire.......really they did! That could also be a level 26 arctic armor.......how much mitigation is that I wonder. The fact that traps were nerfed in damage by nearly the amount empower would give them truly sickens me. Last edited by Gravethought#3018 on Sep 6, 2013, 11:26:03 AM
|
![]() |
" It has a max level of 3, so no. |
![]() |
And normal gems say "Max" level at 20, yet can be pushed higher, we won't know until someone has it.
|
![]() |
" That's because their max level is not level 20. lol. |
![]() |
/facepalm
The only thing max has ever meant in this game is the most a gem could be leveled through experience. No one had ever seen a level 25 of a gem because before empower it would have been impossible. |
![]() |