Area Quantity not being properly calculated?

Bug Report ID: #3450509893

I don't believe map area item quantity is being properly calculated. With 88% increased effect of map modifiers and 15% extra quantity on my atlas tree, I am consistently seeing less item quantity in-map than what it shows on the itemized map *1.88 + 15.

Item rarity, however, appears to be closer to the expected value using that formula.

I have screenshots of one example:

The itemized map:


Here we can see that item quantity is +138%. 138 * 1.88 + 15 = 274.

However, in-map I get 254% (excluding altars):



Rarity shows 202%, which is much closer to the expected 204%. This is within rounding error range, while quantity is WAY off. I don't think something is being counted or scaled correctly.

Here is my atlas tree with stats shown:
Last bumped on Jul 16, 2025, 3:40:08 PM
"
With 88% increased effect of map modifiers and 15% extra quantity on my atlas tree, I am consistently seeing less item quantity in-map than what it shows on the itemized map *1.88 + 15.

It doesn't look like you used Maven's chisels on the map shown.

This means that at 20% quality, the item had +20% Item Quantity. This would not be affected by your Atlas tree's "increased effect of explicit modifiers". With 88% increased effect of explicit modifiers, this made your estimated expectation too high by 17% or 18%.
"
Jadian#0111 wrote:

It doesn't look like you used Maven's chisels on the map shown.

This means that at 20% quality, the item had +20% Item Quantity. This would not be affected by your Atlas tree's "increased effect of explicit modifiers". With 88% increased effect of explicit modifiers, this made your estimated expectation too high by 17% or 18%.


You're definitely correct. Thanks!

I hadn't thought of that, since explicit modifier effect seems to apply to all other stats on the map - but now that I think about it, I understand why that's true. It's not that it applies to the stats shown; it's that it applies to their source (the explicit modifiers).

For consistency, I hope the same is true with maven chisels!

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info