Steam is going balistic

"
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
"
I like how GGG fanboys trying to say that "these reviews are not constructive". Just come on, guys. Everyone who bought this for 30 bucks have the right to thumb this down after 0.2
These feedbacks don't have to be constructive, they easily can be emotional. No problem to hate this game right now and not writing essays about it.


Sadly, you are wrong. Emotional feedback is not useful here, no matter what people say. Game development is a science, especially with games as complex as this. If you want fast food gaming you have to go elsewhere. Then your emotional feedback might be all that is needed. But with a game as complex as this you need to be a little bit more detailed.

I am not wrong absolutely. People are not obligated to write constructive feedback. When you're buying something you may not like it and that's it. You can say whatever you want, but people right now buying THIS for 30$ can be upset.


Yeah then be upset. Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:


Yeah then be upset. Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

I will do all I have the right to do and I personally don't care about what you think about it.
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
"
The exact principle you attach to the "doomers" can be said about the "glazers".

It's not up to us to "filter" that stuff, that's up to the ppl at GGG who view feedback and then decide what's "worthy" to pass to the devs.


That is also not how game development works, as much as you would probably like that.
Aha, then explain how it works.

And not for anyone, we talk about "Grinding Gear Games".
[Removed by Support]
Dude they do not listen to feedback at all, why bother, leave negative review, don't buy anything from the shop, thats it. They have time to go on holidays, still no time to fix the game. Think about it. I wonder why Rogers is still a game director after this failure.
Last edited by GimmeZeLoot#1718 on Apr 24, 2025, 9:57:18 AM
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

This doesn't exist mate. If the game is good, ppl are not writing essays nor read them, they play the game.
It really is that simple.
"
rob_korn#1745 wrote:
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

This doesn't exist mate. If the game is good, ppl are not writing essays nor read them, they play the game.
It really is that simple.

Harsh truth. This game has SO MUCH drama around just because it's bad in current state.
"
rob_korn#1745 wrote:
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

This doesn't exist mate. If the game is good, ppl are not writing essays nor read them, they play the game.
It really is that simple.


What if the game is good and the people here claiming otherwise are just lying?
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
"
rob_korn#1745 wrote:
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

This doesn't exist mate. If the game is good, ppl are not writing essays nor read them, they play the game.
It really is that simple.


What if the game is good and the people here claiming otherwise are just lying?

Oh my Lord :D
"
rob_korn#1745 wrote:
"
Naharez#3496 wrote:
Don't try to convince others to be upset, too.

This doesn't exist mate. If the game is good, ppl are not writing essays nor read them, they play the game.
It really is that simple.
Has a lot of truth to it.
If you own a restaurant or any other service-oriented business, you mostly (not always) get ppl with negative feedback who voice it very clearly, while the ppl with positive feedback leave a "like", if anything.
[Removed by Support]
"
Oh my Lord :D


Prove me wrong.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info