Transfigured version of Shrapnel Ballista interaction with Replica Iron Commander is broken

Replica Iron Commander has a unique modifier that increases the maximum number of totems (for Shrapnel Ballista skill) per 200 Strength

My character has over 3600 Strength, so for regular Shrapnel Ballista I'm able to summon roughly 26 totems.





But when using its transfigured version,



I'm only able to summon 8, that number stricken me, so by doing some maths I was able to identify that this is just the base value with some of my Passive Skills.



1 from Base
+3 from the Shrapnel Ballista of Steel
+1 from Pursuit of Faith (ascendancy skill)
+1 from Panapticon (passive skill)
+1 from Watchtowers

The +1 is actually coming from Replica Iron Commander, I used another bow and I could verify that it is trying to instantiate the totems based on Strength, but it is failing somehow



I don't think this is expected behavior, but also, this interaction with Steel Shards is also unexpected. I hope you guys fix it

Thank you in advance!

Bug Report reference number #3016979296

Bump?

I have not seen this mentioned in Known issues or Announcements, I just wanted to know if this is expected behavior or not

Bump

Having same issue Iron Commander with Siege Ballista of Splintering

I was about to report the same issue (with the normal version not replica)

thanks you for looking into it

"

Jatin_GGG wrote:

Thanks for your report, I'll pass this on.

Same problem also occur for normal Iron Commander together with Siege Ballista of Splintering

This is most likely caused by the fact that the exact gem name is stated on the bows as 'Shrapnel Ballista' and 'Siege Ballista' - so the normal gem versions are stated there but not their transfigured versions...

Thinking the same way that this is the root cause of the issue and hope it will be fixed for both gems soon as it is currently making this new version unplayable but I would love to play it.

Hey there I haven't seen this posted yet

I don't know if it is being investigated or not, are we gonna be left in the dark?

Please give us some updates D:

"

Jatin_GGG wrote:

Thanks for your report, I'll pass this on.

Still waiting for an update on this one, my build does not function as i planned to ;(
Should I make a separate thread for the normal unique version? (OP only mentions the problem with replica)