Issue with duplicate trade website Crucible Passive Tree affixes (server load+differentiation)
Screenshot:
![]() Per the screenshot, I'm searching under the "Crucible Passive Tree Path" for "supported by" affixes, but I think this may apply to some other affixes outside this category as well. Many of the basic (level 10, some level 25) support gem nodes are apparent (but not actually) duplicates, causing me and others to add both to avoid missing items, probably hitting the servers much harder in their time of need. I tested searching using each duplicate node for many different gems and they are *NOT* functional duplicates, meaning I do *NOT* find the same items with both. I check only the top one and I find nothing (presumably it applies in some other search context) but the bottom one finds the staves I'm looking for in this example. Since there's no way to tell which one is "right" for any given search, I'm having to add both to everything so I don't miss items. >> Suggestion to fix this: Please find out why these are not actually duplicates in practice, yet have duplicate names in search, and consider differentiating them somehow, likely by appending a tag/descriptor so we know which one selects for what. I'm assuming it's all imported via script from game data, so maybe there's some way to script or find/replace on the JSON based on whatever the behind-the-scenes difference is and append a tag, like "(2-handed weapons)" for example. Last bumped on May 3, 2023, 12:52:26 AM
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
![]() |
In case anyone wants to know why this is happening:
It isn't a bug. It's because there are duplicates of many crucible passives with different weights at the same tier. I originally thought it was for classes with compatible subclasses where both have the potential to roll that passive (i.e. staves and warstaves) but looking further into PoEDB one of the passives is unique to hardmode, almost certainly the one with a lower weight (didn't check). So, because search is generic for both modes, and there is no way to differentiate in there which one is hardmode and which one is everyone else, just add both. Last edited by bcbigb#5046 on May 3, 2023, 12:52:38 AM
|
![]() |