Oh No; No Divine Orb Recipe . . . ?!Is It April Fools . . . !?No!? . . . wait . . no no No NO NO NO
(this is all mostly itterating the acutrement-attunement most agreeable for a gentle & gradual divine election \ selection \ throning : the re-enstatement of the divine-orb-recipe via the simple stable staple sample : any 6-Link)
{I encourage you to enrich the game to 20 xD fusing orb fore the treasure of 5-links . . . who you may have been meaning to indicate is the ingredient for the consequent twenty fusing orb :D and that marvelous humor aired } [!like insult to Six-Links across the board to be attacked of their divine-legacy too mate:] Bombastically belligerently bewilderingly obliteratingly skew logix Out-of-touch Ya Affirmative top down logic puxxle reads People a) use them People b) use what their new crafting bench role will be People c) divine that foreseeable double demands supply with a known recipe And while multiplying that demand by its channels or angles you remove the coursing or angels from it AND YOU REMOVE THE SUPPLY AND REMOVING THE SUPPLY orienting the demand via anticipatable but intangible-unforeseeable multiplications of (at these various currency roles apptitude who is branching) extra game rarity factors (what does the here now branching currency orb enable or disable as to cauldron or stew of it’s seen or scene presenting presence or absense) rarity factors upon rarity demand hellish plateau onto absolute asymptote : scare city . . . Divining your game out of its divine orb recipe is as logically backwards contrary and loco As master memories of which there are nothing in them Of harvest crops that bear no seeds Of beyond demons … actually … there is no way that I’d like to deface the logic of the new scourge-beyond As I am laying out components of this coming league I am most activated for so you can appreciate how absolute the divine-recipe-removal with doubling nay multiplying demand for divining orbs maneuver is - that - pristine and placid I shall forego or boycott the game in darkness of such an angling The opulent modifier on arch nemesis rares as being a guarenteed divine orb lane might be a godsend as as per emulating a mirror of kalandra double or repeat divination my seeking of beyond-rework was that beyond would spawn rares and rares of opulence rather than uniques and uniques of smothering And beyond-rework I hope your game survives … we claim to be dishing dollopings fore uniques … and it seems to me multiplying dual demand lanes and obliterating supply lane singular As Is an attack on the true uniques, any playee eaching via ashes, shaco, you name it, etc & moderate playees casualness .!. casually polishing & comedically correcting & righting & doctoring: meta uniques AND moderate casuals aspiring to engage our crafting bench . . . Yew guide czar playing width sum fun ki magiC awn disc one Zero-sphere says: “I know we aren’t acquainted, but I like my kicks in the nuts to be actual kicks in the nuts; but thanks for the easiest decision of my life: steering clear of such a here-now vein as aye have bowed to ^^ above” “We have increased the drop rate of divines or lowered its rarity making its here-now stable available and easy to attain and maintain for any average playee” “The archnemesis modifier “opulent” now guarentees at least one divine orb per cull” Just like..compared to exalts..and blessed orbs.. I don’t think you’re seeing how staple the divine orb was and how amplifying that via the craft bench (-! Another staple) value and removing the supply is Anyway I’ve approached this geometry logic puzzle resolve with a trinity of angling architectures dangling ready answerings reitteratively Sorry I’m not in a better position to correct this or remedy this abuse myself Seems a catastrophe I enjoyed airing this "restore the divine-orb six-link recipe" solution-suggestion from me at Vamphyr's "Divine And Exalted Orbs" and I must say IRL this "value" notion crossed my desk in the form of "perrenial" principle virtue; vs bass-access in a very root way earlier this month; to which I apply affinity must be anything if infinity is : everything just model-wise and I shall gaze back and access that "for the nothing that is something sacred; and the something that is nothing sacred" and anything-everything-nothing-and-somethings interchangingly delightingly avataring glee universiality masterpiece perfecting infinity accepting and adapting berth birth dao nows then zens Last bumped on Aug 12, 2022, 10:38:20 AM
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
![]() |
if you want your post to have merit and be taken serious, don't write like you're in the movie v for fking vendeta
|
![]() |