Guild Ranks ~ How is this not a thing yet?

We need to be able to assign people to manage the hideout and guild stash tabs. I searched up the word, "officer" and there was one post from 2016 and that's it. Has GGG said why this isn't a thing? I assumed the affinity and ctrl-clicking into guild stash limitations had to do with server stability, but now we have that and we still can't have any other guildies touch the tab names, colors, now the hideout, ect...

Cheers for any obvious "they said it here... ->" reply or anything. I haven't seen anything. :(

Agreed 100%. My guild mates and I keep passing leadership around as we log off so people can help build the hideout. It's very cumbersome. I would love for GGG to have an option to allow officers to edit the hideout.

i personally dislike ranks for guilds, it brings the wrong focus and attitude to a guild which is supposed to be a social place

"

lagwin1980 wrote:

i personally dislike ranks for guilds, it brings the wrong focus and attitude to a guild which is supposed to be a social place

OK I think I get where you're coming from.

The hierarchy makes it feel structured and not just a group of friends?

Whether there are more ranks or not I don't really care, I just want more people in the guild to be able to decorate the hideout and name guild tabs.

The simple and obvious solution to this is to let officers edit stash names/colors/affinities/order/etc, and guild hideout (or at least let them create a basic one if there isn't one).

Why this isn't the case already is perplexing. They are officers, let them be assigned officer duties. Currently the guild leader is the only person who can do anything (other than invite to guild), so if they aren't around, you're shit out of luck. It's absurd.

I'm very excited about guild features and I hope GGG since it's adding new stuff could review this.

I have a guild in another game and it is cool, for roleplaying reasons, to have different ranks, specially if you can name them.

Exactly, 100%.