Game Clients: Path of Exile on Steam vs Path of Exile website download

tbh the problem isn't the downloading x'D
it's the fact that the rest takes ages like 100mb patch on steam? is downloaded in 2 seconds. yet takes up to 5+ minutes which is really a pain in the arse.
3.26 when?
Don't abandon us. don't turn your backs on the ones loving poe.
"
Wolfy339 wrote:
The only reasons I don't have an SSD at present are -
1. Cost (too expensive per GB, IMO)
2. Capacity (for the capacity I'm looking for - 2TB or better - its expensive if even available)
3. Reliability (I think SSDs aren't quite on par with mechanical drives for reliability yet, but soon will be).


Photos, video, documents, music etc. DON'T need to be on an SSD - that makes your storage needs much smaller (unless you're on a laptop with just 1 drive slot but that's getting rare these days)

SSDs are WAY more reliable than at-launch, they do fail but then so do HDDs so everything has to be backed-up either way...

Putting your OS onto an SSD will revolutionize how your system starts/runs and you can do that on a 120Gb SSD (suggest 240Gb or larger as 120Gb drives are slow) - that's just $50

How I'm setup

C: - contains Windows and key programs/files ONLY - 240Gb partition of 500Gb SSD
D: - contains games as-well-as swapfile - rest of SSD
E: - storage including default Steam Library, Documents/Music/Videos folders - one big HDD

The reason I split the SSD is that I image-backup C: on a weekly basis and DON'T want to include games or documents in that (for speed/space)

Then - if the SSD fails I simply restore it (via memory-stick to a new SSD or even to the HDD) - the games I can redownload and other files are cloud-backed-uped separately
Last edited by ohnpeat#0565 on Apr 30, 2020, 10:55:54 AM
i tried both and both ran the same the difference is just with patching the game but on steam you get the steam overlay which is quite nice imo
"
ohnpeat wrote:
SSDs are WAY more reliable than at-launch, they do fail but then so do HDDs so everything has to be backed-up either way...

How I'm setup

C: - contains Windows and key programs/files ONLY - 240Gb partition of 500Gb SSD
D: - contains games as-well-as swapfile - rest of SSD
E: - storage including default Steam Library, Documents/Music/Videos folders - one big HDD


Fair point about the backups and I recall having a mechanical drive or two fail on my personal systems. Professionally I have seen SSDs fail at about the same rate as mechanical drives - about every 18 months to 2 years, however, I believe that failure rate comparison may be at least somewhat environment and/or SSD brand dependent. Other than that I've tried partitioning schemes like what describe on other machines and it was enough of a pain in the rear end to make me decide "never again". I guess I like the KISS principle when it comes to partitioning.
Last edited by Wolfy339#6765 on Apr 30, 2020, 1:32:53 PM
Only problem with Steam is, as others have said, the patching file is huge. If it was all the same I would use the Steam client. I have a 1gb internet connection and SSD on a high end system (i9/64Gb Ram/nVidia 2080/ 4TB of SSD) and still choose to go non-steam despite all my other games being through it.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
"
ohnpeat wrote:

C: - contains Windows and key programs/files ONLY - 240Gb partition of 500Gb SSD
D: - contains games as-well-as swap file - rest of SSD
E: - storage including default Steam Library, Documents/Music/Videos folders - one big HDD


I have 3 drives as well.
2 SSD (1 @ 120GB and 1 @ 500GB) and 1 good old 7200RPM unit (@ 1 TB)
Windows is on the 120.
PoE on the 500GB SSD and Steam on the TB drive.

Windows (which I have been using since 3.11 Windows for Workgroups) has never run so well as on an SSD, IMHO.
~ Please separate the PoE1 and PoE2 forums.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info