Stackable Fossils Coming This Week!

directly load to hideout BlessRNG

pog :)

Can we just get a delve tab?

Really? 6 minutes to say we want a special tab? What a waste. They needed to do this BEFORE making a tab for it. Now that they have, they can work on the tab. They couldn't do it in the other order.

Stackable fossiles, naice!

"

knolly wrote:

There's plenty of room on the fragment tab for 25 fossils and 7 resonators. No need for a new tab just yet.

Hah... only reason they put dev money into this is so they can sell a new type of Stash Tab.

FTP games are all designed around ways of making players slightly, subtly miserable, then offering way for them to pay to end said misery.

Of course in GGG's case it's been amateur hour forever, so tons of what makes us miserable hasn't been monetized yet at all and we just get to... be miserable.

I was literally talking about this yesterday

I would still prefer to buy special fossil stash tab if possible, because of QoL it would provide - every fossil/resonator would be in its own, fixed and well known place, in one single tab.

But having stackable fossils is better than what we have atm, so thank you for implementing it for free.

There will be a tab. They couldn't make a tab and then later change how the items in the tab worked, because then they'd have to remake the tab too. So they've gotten them where they like them and are now going to work out a tab for them. Patience.

If delve stash tab is coming, then i'm not sure if we need stacking fossils at all. Stackability of fossils may add redundant additional actions to their usage - unlike currency, where LMB is used to take/put stack and RMB is used to use currency, for fossils LMB is used for both "take/put" and "use" actions (where "use" is socketing fossil into resonator*). In my opinion, the only way to resolve this issue is to change which MB is used to socket fossil into resonator - to make it RMB instead of LMB, i.e. to make it the same as used for currency. In this case, stackability of fossils will bring no downsides to their usage.

*edit:
after a minute of thinking, i realized fossils don't have "use" action at all, which means GGG would have to overhaul how fossils are socketed/unsocketed in order to match currency usage, i.e. to add "use" action for fossils under RMB.