Multiple Totems =? Ritual of awakening =>weaker templar

Well with the new Gem Multiple Totems we thought it would buff totem players yet it seems does not stack it's even( almost) equal to it's Ritual of awakening, so if giving that to everyone else allowing them3-4 totems and 2isntant cast what did you leave for the templar totem build?? basically if this gem doesn't stack with Ritual of awakening then it's nerfing this class comparing the buff to all others

So many hype there was before actual lvling league experience started...

Now all quiet.
I`ve yet to see any totem+1 on gear, lol

RIP

You also have to take in mind that both "Spell Totem Support" and "Multi Totems" have "less damage" modifiers, if you start using as soon as you get, might end up with 60% less damage.

I ditched the support and went as defensive Hiero instead. Going for Mini MoM and node after that, two totems is more than enough for a starter build (for me at least).

Lol. First world issues man.

"Why is my totem build no longer superior to all the other totem builds out there!!!"

Hiero node gives you leech and 12% more dmg (if used with 4 totems)

Hierophant isnt nerfed, its just no longer the only option in the game if you want to play totem build.

"

Anonymous1749704 wrote:

Lol. First world issues man.

"Why is my totem build no longer superior to all the other totem builds out there!!!"

that question is actually not that stupid.
for hierophant not getting that additional totem placement means losing something else compared to other classes in their ascendancy. if you use the multi totem support like every other totem user, you get only half the benefit from it compared to the others. this is a problem.

edit:
its the same as fire conversion damage from chieftain wouldnt stack with avatar of fire or a "to fire conversion" gem/item.

"

Roa81 wrote:

this is a problem.

So you saying that making Hiero no longer only option for totem build is a problem?
Yeah, lets pigeonhole every "archetype" to one ascendency...

"

Aynix wrote:

"

Roa81 wrote:

this is a problem.

So you saying that making Hiero no longer only option for totem build is a problem?
Yeah, lets pigeonhole every "archetype" to one ascendency...

im not saying that hiero should be the only ascendancy for totems. but cutting of part of the gem/ascendancy compared to others is wrong. then the ascendancy should be changed, so that it wont interfere with the gem.

are there other ascendancys that have the same problem?

If you use a hammer to try to screw in a screw, you're going to have similar results.


I do agree that removing the "+1 totem" from Hierophant was a mistake. Taking away a defining feature of a class isn't a great idea unless it is just way too powerful. This one was not.

"

Roa81 wrote:

"

Aynix wrote:

"

Roa81 wrote:

this is a problem.

So you saying that making Hiero no longer only option for totem build is a problem?
Yeah, lets pigeonhole every "archetype" to one ascendency...

im not saying that hiero should be the only ascendancy for totems. but cutting of part of the gem/ascendancy compared to others is wrong. then the ascendancy should be changed, so that it wont interfere with the gem.

are there other ascendancys that have the same problem?

Yes. Necromancer can summon more skeletons with one clik, but it can be also aquired from unique jewel.