[Suggestion] A Toggle Option for "Display Load Screen Art for 5 seconds" for the new Load Screens

"
Fruz wrote:
If you give the option "loading screen last 5 seconds" to users, some users on very bad spec will ( it will happen ) think that it can improve their loading, and will try it, and that "loading screen last 5 seconds" will turn to a lie to them.


You cannot be serious, Fruz... The more I read your replies and ScrotieMcB's reply, the more I believe you two like to argue for the sake of arguing.

First of all, the Option suggested in my OP is not named 'loading screen last 5 seconds'. It is properly named 'Display Load Screen Art for 5 Seconds' (BIG difference) implying that enabling that Option is just for that: enjoying the Art of the Load Screen!

"
Fruz wrote:
Adding "at least" to the wording solves that problem.


My wording of 'Display Load Screen Art for 5 Seconds' is more than good enough. You just want to argue for the sake of arguing to make it seem like it is not good enough. Sorry.

"
Fruz wrote:
I guess your "common sense" did not go as far as seeing that heh...


Perhaps when you read this reply, and then re-read my OP, then what is common sense (not my common sense) will kick in for you. My wording of things has been quite clear for already-explained reasons.

"
Fruz wrote:
And no, Scrote did have a point, if you can GGG to implement such a thing, GGG needs a good reason to do so, and as he pointed out, GGG might not want to spend time ( as little as it would take ) on something that would be useful for player for what ... less than a week in many (most?) cases ?

You missed his point too it seems, simple as that.


The fact English just may not be your main language in conjunction with the fact you are writing in broken English (do I have to point it out?) seems to be the big part of the problem understanding what I am saying/what my OP is saying. Not only that, you are taking things out of context that does nothing to support your end of the discussion here.

"
Fruz wrote:
I though that this was open to discussion, turns out that you are completely closed to discussion, no point here.


It is open to discussion. We are discussing this, are we not? If I was not open to discussion, I would not even bother replying to you. All I am doing is proving the points I made throughout my replies to you that are also repeated in my OP.

Your thing is you are probably used to having a discussion with those who can dish it out but cannot take it. I am not one of those people.
When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails.
Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism
does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect.
(me)
Last edited by HeavyMetalGear#2712 on Sep 4, 2016, 12:43:02 AM
"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:
The more I read your replies and ScrotieMcB's reply, the more I believe you two like to argue for the sake of arguing.
Interesting theory.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:
The more I read your replies and ScrotieMcB's reply, the more I believe you two like to argue for the sake of arguing.
Interesting theory.


No, it is not a theory. I have had a few bouts with you before, and far as I can recall, it did not end well for you, just like it won't end well for you now because all you can say in reply to everything I pointed out that was right and clarified for you is, and I quote, "Interesting theory." end of quote

No, sir, that is not a theory. Going through many of the threads you have commented on, you really do like to argue, and oftentimes you are right about most things/issues, but sometimes you are just not, and this is one of those topics regarding a 'flexible' suggestion for those in-game who may want to enable the 'Display Load Screen Art for 5 seconds' Option and for those who may not.
When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails.
Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism
does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect.
(me)
Last edited by HeavyMetalGear#2712 on Sep 4, 2016, 12:52:19 AM
"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:

My wording of 'Display Load Screen Art for 5 Seconds' is more than good enough. You just want to argue for the sake of arguing to make it seem like it is not good enough. Sorry.

No it's not, I just gave you an example of something that would happen, even with that wording.
The "art" words makes no difference, it would happen all the same.

I did not bother to completely re-read my posts yeah, because it is just going nowhere here, as obvious as it is.
The fact that you are starting on this means that you do not have actually anything to say, you're corenered sort-of.
I did not take anything out of context, you are just completely either ignoring, or not understanding the points that we made, and you keep going with it and it's completely pointless.


We are not discussing, you are dismissing everything that is not exactly like what you proposed, this isn't a discussion.

I am happy to discuss with open minded people that accept other's point of views, you do not seem to fit in this category at all I'm afraid.


"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:
and far as I can recall, it did not end well for you, just it won't end well for you now




PS : in case you missed it "he has a point" does not imply "your idea is shit"
just in case ... ( I explicitely explained you what I meant by the fact that he had a point, BTW )
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
Last edited by Fruz#6137 on Sep 4, 2016, 12:56:06 AM
"
Fruz wrote:
No it's not, I just gave you an example of something that would happen, even with that wording.


Right, and your example was poor for already-explained reasons, and I have every right to point out poor examples during a discussion!

"
Fruz wrote:
The "art" words makes no difference, it would happen all the same.


That is ignorance at its finest. Excuse me, but 'Display Load Screen Art for 5 seconds' does not imply anyone in-game would get some 'advantage' so as to load the Load Screens quicker like the beginning of your claim on Page 1, 10th comment down suggests, and I quote, "If you give the option "loading screen last 5 seconds" to users, some users on very bad spec will ( it will happen ) think that it can improve their loading, and will try it, and that "loading screen last 5 seconds" will turn to a lie to them." end of quote

Are you serious? No, of course not. You really cannot be that deficient in common sense. You just like to argue : )

"
Fruz wrote:
I did not bother to completely re-read my posts yeah, because it is just going nowhere here, as obvious as it is.


Completely re-reading your posts was something I did not suggest that would only lead you back to the beginning of being a fool all over again. Quote if you can that I suggested such a thing.

What I did say was, and I quote, "Perhaps when you read this reply [being my reply], and then re-read my OP, then what is common sense (not my common sense) will kick in for you. My wording of things has been quite clear for already-explained reasons." end of quote

"
Fruz wrote:
The fact that you are starting on this means that you do not have actually anything to say, you're corenered sort-of.


Except I do have a lot to say in return to baseless feedback with the intent to twist somebody's OP/idea to a convoluted degree to make the OP/idea look like there is really something wrong with the OP/idea when there was nothing wrong with the OP/idea to begin with.

"
Fruz wrote:
I did not take anything out of context, you are just completely either ignoring, or not understanding the points that we made, and you keep going with it and it's completely pointless.


You are right, this is pointless because the above is exactly what you are doing, not me.

Saying, and I quote, "If you give the option "loading screen last 5 seconds" to users, some users on very bad spec will ( it will happen ) think that it can improve their loading, and will try it, and that "loading screen last 5 seconds" will turn to a lie to them." end of quote, notably in the bold text quoted from you IS taking something out of context to support your baseless claims.

Now, had the Option in my OP's suggestion been named anything like "Loading Screen lasts 5 seconds" or "Loading Screen lasts 5 seconds less' then that would be different and arguable, but it wasn't.

"
Fruz wrote:
We are not discussing, you are dismissing everything that is not exactly like what you proposed, this isn't a discussion.


There is a such thing, you know, as having a discussion while 'dismissing' somebody's poor examples, poorly points made, etc. and yes, that is what I did/am doing (for a good reason).

"
Fruz wrote:
I am happy to discuss with open minded people that accept other's point of views, you do not seem to fit in this category at all I'm afraid.


[Removed by Support]
When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails.
Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism
does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect.
(me)
Last edited by Melissa_GGG#0000 on Sep 4, 2016, 4:54:35 PM
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:
The more I read your replies and ScrotieMcB's reply, the more I believe you two like to argue for the sake of arguing.
Interesting theory.
SSF is not and will never be a standard for balance, it is not for people entitled to getting more without trading.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
On most computers the PrintScreen key copies an image of the current screen to the clipboard.

Edit: GGG should also release some high-res wallpapers.

Enjoy the thread, fellows.


Wouldn't your wise-guy suggestion in the above quoted make players who follow that suggestion get tired of the Load Screen Art even faster by being able to stare at it for an indefinite period time beyond just 5 seconds every time they load, that which would then go against your main argument pointing out how players will tire of the Load Screen Art?

The more you should know...

With that being said in mind, in case it did not occur to you, perhaps some players with extremely fast loading times would much rather get their 'fill' of Load Screen Art for 5 seconds at a time instead of for an indefinite period of time.
When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails.
Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism
does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect.
(me)
Last edited by HeavyMetalGear#2712 on Sep 4, 2016, 3:31:08 AM
"
Fruz wrote:
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
HeavyMetalGear wrote:
The more I read your replies and ScrotieMcB's reply, the more I believe you two like to argue for the sake of arguing.
Interesting theory.


You two have not disproved it, you two do not deny it, therefore, it is not a theory.

Go troll somebody else's threads. Thank you : )
When game developers ignore the criticism that would improve their game, the game fails.
Just because a game receives a great amount of praise vs. only a small amount of criticism
does not mean to call it a day and make a foolish misplaced assumption that it is perfect.
(me)
Last edited by HeavyMetalGear#2712 on Sep 4, 2016, 2:09:54 AM

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info