One (Free) Premium Stash Tab for Everyone

"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
* the number of Premium tabs people should get for free is ZERO


Agreed. It's amazing how quickly many people claim that GGG owes them something all of a sudden. They don't owe anyone a thing.

If you want to participate in this quality of life trade related improvement while at the same time supporting a game you obviously love enough to get so emotional in the forums about then awesome, they can use all the support they can get. Servers, salaries, overhead and all the other expenses related to this game certainly aren't free. If one wants to continue to freeload you can still do that as well.
Guild Leader - LÉGÄCY


POE is happy good luck fun time for great imperialistic leaders!
"
DigitalDreams wrote:
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
* the number of Premium tabs people should get for free is ZERO


Agreed. It's amazing how quickly many people claim that GGG owes them something all of a sudden. They don't owe anyone a thing.

If you want to participate in this quality of life trade related improvement while at the same time supporting a game you obviously love enough to get so emotional in the forums about then awesome, they can use all the support they can get. Servers, salaries, overhead and all the other expenses related to this game certainly aren't free. If one wants to continue to freeload you can still do that as well.


If you read the post, you would know that he's not going on about being "owed" something by GGG, he's putting forward a pretty reasonable argument for players getting 1 free premium tab.

If people get serious about trade, 1 free tab will not be enough to satisfy them.
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
Premium stash tabs are actually pretty useless for non-traders if you only have one.

I believe that:
* non-Premium tabs should get the Public checkbox
* non-Premium tabs should NOT get tabwide identifiers - if you're that cheap, price each item individually
* the number of Premium tabs people should get for free is ZERO


I 100% agree.

Alternatively, giving a free premium tab UPGRADE (with a 15 point refund to those that already upgraded all their tabs) would also work, but not as well.
why not let every tab be able to be made a "public" trading tab?
"
pandasplaying wrote:
why not let every tab be able to be made a "public" trading tab?


I'm guessing it's some form of bot prevention. The types that would create throwaway accounts to bot on wouldn't be willing to invest money into the account, could be wrong though.
Guild Leader - LÉGÄCY


POE is happy good luck fun time for great imperialistic leaders!
"
DigitalDreams wrote:
"
pandasplaying wrote:
why not let every tab be able to be made a "public" trading tab?
I'm guessing it's some form of bot prevention. The types that would create throwaway accounts to bot on wouldn't be willing to invest money into the account, could be wrong though.
Considering that accounts already have trade prohibitions until sufficiently leveled, and any level can post to trade forums (which aren't being shut down), your theory seems quite unlikely.
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
Does anybody actually think this would end all the arguments we've seen today? Do this and tomorrow the threads start that 1 tab isn't enough and having 2 makes the game p2w and whatever other complaints people come up with.
Guild Leader The Amazon Basin <BASIN>
Play Nice and Show Some Class www.theamazonbasin.com
"
ScrotieMcB wrote:
"
DigitalDreams wrote:
"
pandasplaying wrote:
why not let every tab be able to be made a "public" trading tab?
I'm guessing it's some form of bot prevention. The types that would create throwaway accounts to bot on wouldn't be willing to invest money into the account, could be wrong though.
Considering that accounts already have trade prohibitions until sufficiently leveled, and any level can post to trade forums (which aren't being shut down), your theory seems quite unlikely.


Considering the problems GGG has been having with bots, in spite of what you're saying, it's not that unlikely at all.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info