am i the only one who finds this picture rather inappropriate?

"

M_Ronin wrote:

Isn't this the monster that "shoots" 3 white projectiles at you?

Now it all makes sense...

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

Someone had to make an equally asinine innuendo for you to 'get it'?

Worst GD thread ever.

Have a bump, you embarrassing little splat of creamy filth of a discussion.

You have serious problems and in surprised ggg does not remove replies requested to be removed by the maker of the thread

"

swedishdough wrote:

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

Someone had to make an equally asinine innuendo for you to 'get it'?

Worst GD thread ever.

Have a bump, you embarrassing little splat of creamy filth of a discussion.

You have serious problems and in surprised ggg does not remove replies requested to be removed by the maker of the thread

Huh? You really want to open that can?

Leave it alone... poor thing already has to live with a 13" kindergarten pencil.

Look at the shade below. His penis is a ... FORK!

Are people surprised over a nude monster having genitals?

Clothe it, if it bother you that much instead of ranting >:(

There. I did it for you.

Nothing is ever "inappropriate", nothing is ever "offensive" either. Nothing is off limits, be it on art or commentary for that matter.

Threads like this are fucking ridiculous. Freedom of expression in all forms trumps the sensitivity of others 100% of the time.

That is also why I disagree with the care bear forum rules introduced awhile ago. It doesn't matter if someone gets upset or offended. That is the upset person's problem and no one elses.

So back to this thread, keep rocking out with your cock out demon bro!

"

CharanJaydemyr wrote:

You are wrong. Every work of art must justify its transgressions. Its deviance and its defiance.

PoE more than does that. Its depraved content is true to the context and consistent with the vision.

Art can be offensive, insensitive and incendiary. It stops being art when it has no value beyond that.

Your simplification of the dialogue between artist, artwork and consumer is indicative of a certain ignorance in the matter. You must have led a very blessed, or at least sheltered life to never once have found something offensive or insulting.

There I call bullshit.

Sorry but you are the one who is wrong.

This is actually the most wrong you have ever been in a single post. First off it isn't about art. It is about protecting freedom of expressions in all forms. It doesn't matter what form that expression takes or what value you or other people put on that expression. If it is not physically causing another harm, or inciting such then it is not off limits.

Talking about me being sheltered, from you of all people is a huge fucking joke. A trust fund baby like you has little experience in general, but you have previously talked about your own sheltered life on these very forums.

I was kicked out of home at 18, moved to Vietnam on my own, paid my way through college, and now work a good job in Singapore. If you want to dig through all my posts you can find info on at least half of those.

It seems you have very little understanding of the most important human right, such that you think it has to be judged by others to have value for it to be okay.

You have even less of an understanding about what it is like to struggle in life. Unless you count struggling and failing to court a girl.

Yeah I remember you posting about that shit.

"

Fluffy_Puppies wrote:

Nothing is ever "inappropriate", nothing is ever "offensive" either. Nothing is off limits, be it on art or commentary for that matter.

Threads like this are fucking ridiculous. Freedom of expression in all forms trumps the sensitivity of others 100% of the time.

This may be a viable philosophy for anonymous avatars on the internet but I strongly recommend not practising it in real life if you value friends/jobs/relationships.