Donald Trump

Jennik - Your side lost, the election is over, and there is no stopping Trump. Grow up. I know you were probably hoping and praying for the unlikely possibility a recount would flip the election. Ironically, I noticed you went back to melting down on here after the recount attempt got denied. Salty? Bottle that shit up and sell it. I'm a buyer for 2 cents a gram.

I'm not too thrilled about some of Trump's cabinet appointments, but lets just wait and see what he does. I know he's gonna get the tear ducts flowing for people like you, but lets see if he builds/improves "the wall", renegotiates NAFTA, and stops neocon/neoliberal regime change, bomb and rebuild everyone's country type of policies. On top of all this, I hope he continues to throw out zingers on twitter that trigger tear ducts flowing among the right kinds of people.

The people that voted for Trump did so out of complete, unfettered animosity toward your side, and its agenda. Everyone I know personally is laughing. Even my 88 year old grandfather is getting a kick out of the left completely melting down. The winners are eying the losers with a sneering troll face. And further outbursts and meltdowns are just feeding the troll.

Over Thanksgiving dinner, we all sat around the table laughing at the meltdowns over the election. I brought up the University of Michigan handing out play-doh and coloring books, and everyone was laughing. My uncle brought up that the local college did bring in some therapy dogs. Everyone was laughing almost to the point of tears. People of all age groups, from teenagers up to senior citizens. The only "non-Trump" supporter in the family, one of my Aunts didn't show up. And I was like, should I bring her some play-doh and a coloring book? Again, everyone laughed. They were like she's already got therapy cats. She's a weird, lonely cat lady, cuckqueaned by her husband decades ago. She was real mean to me as a kid, so knowing she's mad brings me great joy.

"

MrSmiley21 wrote:

...... brings me great joy.

I have been laughing at their saltiness since the results. You know the main reason why Trump got elected? The hypocrisy of the political class and the left. I remember when project veritas went out and proved that some people out may attempt to rig the election, and then Trump talked about contesting the result if there were such a thing. The medias and politicians slammed him "You shall not contest the results, this is anti-democratic this is dangerous this could be the end of the democracy etc etc.....


First thing they did when they lost was contesting the result and they still do a month after.



The whole campaign of the democrate was just full of shit and hypocrisy. Yes I do agree when they show bad things about Trump, he sure has his flaws. But when you look on the other side they are no better for sure. For every scandal there was with Trump there was a much more worse with Hillary.

Hypocrisy: they accused Trump of being a fear mongerer during his campaign. Yes I agree he did say some scary things. But at the same time, the democrates were calling a "nuclear holocaust" if Trump gets elected. Now that is REAL fear mongering.

They called Trump a sexist, but then they humiliated his wife on national TV in the most sexist way ever.

They were calling Trump a racist because of his thoughts on immigrations "We should not generalize people" that's racist and horrible. Yet the first thing they do is calling every Trump supporter a deplorable.

Hypocrisy is one of the big reasons why Trump won.

Definitely not a fan of all the former "Goldman Sucks" people being given cabinet positions. But there is always the possibility that they're simply a bunch of yes men who're gonna do whatever Trump tells them. And that they just happen to have the sorta knowledge and skill set required for those positions. Most of them are already independently wealthy, meaning that they don't actually need a position like this as a means to personal gains.

Why would a billionaire even take a cabinet position? I dunno, but one of the first things I've observed about really rich people is they have massive egos. To the point where the world can barely contain it. They might take a position like this merely to stroke their inflated egos. I think that has a lot to do with Trump's motivation to run for and get elected president. But someone with a huge ego is someone with intentions that I can understand. They're not necessarily bad by default.

Regarding economy, it's similar to the barber puzzle. If there's two barbers in a shop and one has a good haircut and the other a bad haircut, you ask for the barber with the bad haircut because the other barber cuts his hair.

In the same way, if you're poor in a democracy you should vote for the party which caters to the rich, because if the party of the rich wants to grow their voter base they'll make people richer, while the party of the poor grows their base by making the majority more poor (to the benefit of a small group at the top).

This does assume long-term self-interest, however. If the party of the rich shrinks the size of its base for a short-term cash-in, then of course the people have been duped. But that's a matter of a group saying one thing and doing another; the point is that Republicans say the right things, not necessarily that they perform to expectations.

Pepe won "Fictional Character of the Year". Praise Kek!

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

Regarding economy, it's similar to the barber puzzle. If there's two barbers in a shop and one has a good haircut and the other a bad haircut, you ask for the barber with the bad haircut because the other barber cuts his hair.

In the same way, if you're poor in a democracy you should vote for the party which caters to the rich, because if the party of the rich wants to grow their voter base they'll make people richer, while the party of the poor grows their base by making the majority more poor (to the benefit of a small group at the top).

This does assume long-term self-interest, however. If the party of the rich shrinks the size of its base for a short-term cash-in, then of course the people have been duped. But that's a matter of a group saying one thing and doing another; the point is that Republicans say the right things, not necessarily that they perform to expectations.

I don't think that is right.

The party of rich would have the interest of making themselves rich. They wouldn't have much interest in making the poor richer. In fact, it is in their best interest to make them keep them poor. It would make the poor dependent on the rich. In other word the fortune of the the poor is tied to the rich, hurting the rich would hurt the poor. In such a way, the poor would defend them.

The party of poor would have the interest of making themselves rich. Usually you have to tax the rich to share wealth with the poor. However, Taxing the rich would make them the enemies of the rich. Sharing the wealth with the poor would have very minimum effect and it improvise their treasury, since there is so many of the poor. The poor would demand more and more from their government which they cannot give. That is the dilemma of socialism.

There is no party of the poor. Democrat is the party of the rich, they just target the poor and minorities to win election.

The German globalists are also priming their populace, the psy-ops are probably happening in the entire western world. We have general elections in September, the picture says "Putin's secret war against our elections". Daily reminder that if Hillary would've won, we'd be straight on track for war vs Russia and ultimately World War 3.

"

deathflower wrote:

There is no party of the poor. Democrat is the party of the rich, they just target the poor and minorities to win election.

How can you possibly believe this? Democrats want to increase taxes on the wealthy. They impose restrictions on businesses to help the planet and the people that Republicans are always trying to remove. They create social programs like welfare and Planned Parenthood that Republicans are always trying to destroy. The Democrats obviously want to help the least fortunate. Republicans give no fucks whatsoever about them.

If you want to reply with something like "but they only do those things to get elected," first explain how you know the minds of all those Democrats. Then ask yourself, so fucking what? Even if they secretly had ulterior motives that they ignored in order to do all these things that help the poor, how is that indistinguishable from a party with no ulterior motives?

If you stick to the facts, we have one party that actually helps the poor and one party that fucks them as much as possible.

"

ScrotieMcB wrote:

In the same way, if you're poor in a democracy you should vote for the party which caters to the rich, because if the party of the rich wants to grow their voter base they'll make people richer, while the party of the poor grows their base by making the majority more poor (to the benefit of a small group at the top).

What the fuck? That clearly ridiculous nonsense you just spouted would only work if the parties didn't do what they said they would and instead did the actual opposite. The Republicans actually do things that hurt the poor (badly!) and help the rich. The Democrats actually do things that help the poor. You know the Republican positions on welfare, affordable healthcare, Planned Parenthood, and so many fucking more things that help the poor, right? They want to fucking destroy them!

How can you possibly believe so many blatantly absurd ideas? You seem somewhat educated and are articulate enough that you clearly have more neurons firing than the average Trumper. What the fuck went wrong?!

No poor person in their right mind should ever vote Republican if they place a high value on their financial situation. Of course, the Republicans are almost entirely an opposition party now (Democrats believe this? We believe the opposite! Even on facts!), so you have the problem that so many poor people aren't in their right minds, and allow their ignorance, stupidity, hatred of homosexuals, religious bigotry, xenophobia, racism, and so on to control their votes.

My brother's a Trumper because he really hates "ragheads" and can't stand the Democratic position on immigration. Tons of pieces of shit like him ignore everything that's actually important and vote Republican purely on the basis of their bigotry. Any Trumper with a jot of intellectual integrity will agree with this, so I'm imagining none of you will (or at least will present a strong, reality-denying front and pretend it's not true).

The best thing to do is for California to secede and you can then create your perfect Marxist-Socialist safe space there, with unlimited welfare and immigration. See how long will it last.

Trump has some leftist ideas about economy (protectionism), so do you like him at least there, or is the indoctrination too strong? Deewd, don't hate, luv, and pass the bong.