Donald Trump

"

http://cesrusc.org/election/

Now, you tell me why that poll is flat out fucking retarded. I'll wait.

(That goes for both of you. How about you actually read that page, and tell me exactly how "PRIMARY MODEL" gets its numbers. Again, I'll wait)

Anyone remember Romneys "unskewing"? How'd that work out?

"

Antnee wrote:

"

http://cesrusc.org/election/

Now, you tell me why that poll is flat out fucking retarded. I'll wait.

(That goes for both of you. How about you actually read that page, and tell me exactly how "PRIMARY MODEL" gets its numbers. Again, I'll wait)

Anyone remember Romneys "unskewing"? How'd that work out?

I don't know what you expect to gain by being such a prick. I'm not a Trump supporter, and I am genuinely concerned that he will win (I'm actually more of a Jill Stein supporter). But I'm also not going to keep my head in the sand about the fact that we still have 2.5 months to the election, which is a lot of time for more scandals to emerge about the Clintons, and a lot more violence to happen that reinforces the 'law and order' message of Trump.

So please, continue to be the dismissive prick in the conversation, I'm sure that strategy works well in real life too.

Don't post junk polling as a rebuttal and expect a calm dissertation.

"

Antnee wrote:

Don't post junk polling as a rebuttal and expect a calm dissertation.

I didn't post any polling at all (primary model doesn't use polling data, it uses election data). And I am surprised you don't see the irony in the statement 'junk polling' considering many of the polls are biased and use crude methodology. But again, you have the right to be an asshole, I just don't understand why you want to exercise that right with such fervor.

"

SpanishMonarch wrote:

"

Antnee wrote:

Don't post junk polling as a rebuttal and expect a calm dissertation.

I didn't post any polling at all (primary model doesn't use polling data, it uses election data). And I am surprised you don't see the irony in the statement 'junk polling' considering many of the polls are biased and use crude methodology. But again, you have the right to be an asshole, I just don't understand why you want to exercise that right with such fervor.

See, here's the thing. I know full well which polls are biased, and which use crude methodology. So does everyone who is serious about watching polls.

Tracking polls (like the one manocean posted) which continually poll the same group of people over and over are useful only as a prism through which to see other data; similar to most national polls. They are by and large useless as a predictive model. Everyone who doesn't wear their ass for a hat knows this.

Primary model is yet another "we twisted specific data (which we won't provide, btw) to fit past elections" pile of bullshit. Again, predictively useless. Every cycle sees them pop up, and they are only right until they are wrong. A coin flip is more useful.

Sorry if you don't like my tone... but only one of us is name-calling.

Trump just hired that Breitbart guy (for those who don't know the page, it's a place known for weird stuff like neonazi dog whistles/clickbait, and generally creating a parallel reality/safe space for moronic conservatives) as a replacement for the russian shill. Then he adresses black people and only white people assist. And many more cringeworthy things. I don't even...

Trump's pivot has been a 360º degrees one.

"

Antnee wrote:

"

http://cesrusc.org/election/

Now, you tell me why that poll is flat out fucking retarded. I'll wait.

(That goes for both of you. How about you actually read that page, and tell me exactly how "PRIMARY MODEL" gets its numbers. Again, I'll wait)

Anyone remember Romneys "unskewing"? How'd that work out?

Can't be worse than Reuters removing the "neither" option to skew the poll toward Hillary.

Breitbart is based as fuck by the way, interesting you (Nero) call it a neonazi site lol.

"

Xavderion wrote:

Breitbart is based as fuck by the way, interesting you (Nero) call it a neonazi site lol.

It's creator specifically envisioned it as "the Huffington Post of the right." That is a clear political bias. I would have strong doubts regarding the Huffington Post of anything, but that's just me.

antnee and his buddies protesting against fascism

https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424

"

Manocean wrote:

antnee and his buddies protesting against fascism

https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424

"I have nothing, so I'll attack your character!"

Do I really need to dig up all the heinous videos of Trump supporters openly shouting N-bombs, sucker punching people while they are being escorted out, and generally being shitty human beings?

You gonna take credit for the white supremacist who stabbed an interracial couple, and immediately started talking about Trump?

Or will you just deflect using some asinine meme, in typical Trumpist fashion?