Donald Trump

"

Disrupted wrote:

Speaking of shillary, is it normal for the head of state in the US to campaign for a candidate?

That shit is disgraceful as fuck.

US presidents have been shady since like...forever. The mail stuff is relatively tame (see Scrotie post, he is hardly a bleeding heart liberal for a proper perspective, people at reddit insist that this is more grounds for firing rather than prison) compared to the shit that has happened in the past.

She shouldn't be the next president, but thanks to Trump it won't matter. He is Making Hillary Electable Again. Kinda a lesser evil thing.

Hillary could come out and say she lights kittens on fire for the lolz and I would still vote for her over Trump.

To clarify, I think the mail thing has been grounds for firing and should be grounds for prison. Technically, it has been illegal for some time, but there's been a systemic lack of training and enforcement. It would be silly to imprison everyone who's fucked up this way, but hopefully things can move forward to a point where it would not be silly at all.

There was a part of me hoping she'd get put through the wringer. Not because of justice, but to set an example.

Hillary tweeted this after a black supremacist killed five white cops:



I wanted to rage first but then I laughed.

"

MrTremere wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump is rude. ='[.]'=

Trump isn't simply being rude, he is promoting xenophobia.

Small children are taught about "Stranger Danger" - Trump is merely saying that the US needs to a better job of identifying these strangers before we let them into our country.

Maybe Hillary and the female members of the senate/congress and female governors can go to Germany for a big New Year's Eve meet and greet party with a few thousand unscreened immigrants and see how that goes? We'll be sure they are given "Don't Grope Me" bracelets to protect them.

While Trump is speaking some things that some people don't like to hear - Hillary has moved beyond xenophobia and has actively promoted wars and revolution in multiple foreign nations.

Everytime you watch an ISIS crime, you are watching Hillary's political puppets.

So, a tough choice - vote for someone who says things you disagree with, or vote for the woman who helped ISIS get their start.

"

Xavderion wrote:

Hillary tweeted this after a black supremacist killed five white cops:



I wanted to rage first but then I laughed.

To be honest, I hate being told every time I have some success that it was due to me being white. I hate that everything I do is constanly degraded or mocked. I'm not even allowed to be proud of myself or I'm a bigoted racist. It's hatred against white and it's racism it's disgusting.

"

DalaiLama wrote:

While Trump is speaking some things that some people don't like to hear - Hillary has moved beyond xenophobia and has actively promoted wars and revolution in multiple foreign nations.

The other day I read what militar advisers Trump has. Many have an Iraq background I think (for example, someone working on Blackwater). In that sense, Trump doesn't seem to have advantage over Hillary (there is no denying she is a warhawk). He will be a puppet for neocons, the fall guy like Bush was. Never bought the whole "Iraq was a mistake" from someone who has come in favor of waterboarding and worse.

Then again, I may be overreacting to what I read (here is the list, tell me your opinion, I don't like to read energy specialist and militar advisor in the same sentence after that Iraq fiasco).

If you care about war, I guess there is that guy Johnson (but his economics seem batshit to me, still better than Trump).

"

Xavderion wrote:

Hillary tweeted this after a black supremacist killed five white cops.

Well, random cops killing black people on camera in the same week seem to have a causal relationship with that. You don't have black supremacists in a vacuum. Rather than play team I'd recognize that this is like some kind of cycle of hatred between some cops and some black people. US police seems to have a PR problem (it doesn't mean that police are fascists or something, but if they are perceived like that because of a few bad apples, it's a problem).

"

NeroNoah wrote:

US police seems to have a PR problem (it doesn't mean that police are fascists or something, but if they are perceived like that because of a few bad apples, it's a problem).

The few bad apples are the cause for - overall - isolated incidances, but it's the supposedly good apples who are responsible for the bad apples not to be brought to justice. They are also responsible - by saying and doing nothing - for systematic racism to be able to establish itself within police units.

At least according to this ex-cop (note to Fox News viewers and other apologists: he's black so he's obviously biased and following his BLM cop hating agenda, so don't bother reading):
http://www.vox.com/2015/5/28/8661977/race-police-officer

Ehhhh...Generally I resist to generalize whole groups, even those that I dislike (but leaders are fair game for me). I'm pretty sure there must be a lot of speaking about the subject but that kind of random killing is hard to mitigate (some cops use body cameras, isn't it?).

"

DalaiLama wrote:

"

MrTremere wrote:

"

Raycheetah wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump is rude. ='[.]'=

Trump isn't simply being rude, he is promoting xenophobia.

Small children are taught about "Stranger Danger" - Trump is merely saying that the US needs to a better job of identifying these strangers before we let them into our country.

Maybe Hillary and the female members of the senate/congress and female governors can go to Germany for a big New Year's Eve meet and greet party with a few thousand unscreened immigrants and see how that goes? We'll be sure they are given "Don't Grope Me" bracelets to protect them.

While Trump is speaking some things that some people don't like to hear - Hillary has moved beyond xenophobia and has actively promoted wars and revolution in multiple foreign nations.

Everytime you watch an ISIS crime, you are watching Hillary's political puppets.

So, a tough choice - vote for someone who says things you disagree with, or vote for the woman who helped ISIS get their start.

Yup

Actually almost all the Islamic worlds big problems is due to USA policy. Stating in the 1950 mainly with with supporting basically gangsters (wahhabis) against arab nationalism, sufism, communism, democracy and other representative movements.

This is why Trump telling 1.5B Muslims to go f*ck themselves is retarded IMO. If he were a serious man he'd catalog how ME got so fucked up and yes Hillary and her Husband before her is a big part of it and will make it worse. She is a western hireling like the rest. Clinton foundation is basically on the take of - fascist/little different than ISIS - Al Sauds and rest of the gulf monarchs.

Only real question is does the first female president get us into a nuclear war as she will force the Syrian overthrow for the wahhabis once and for all whether Russians like it or not.

It's not tough choice for me. Trump will be restrained from doing almost anything on foreign policy unlike retard Bush. Keep taxes low and appoint judges who don't legislate from the bench. As a libertarian I cant vote for Hillary. A Marxist and never saw a war she didnt like. She's actually sadist I believe with way she celebrated Kaddfis death. Trump all the way.