Hrimsorrow + Hatred (Conversion + added damage based on physical damage)
|
First: I searched for this, but sources don't seem clear. So here is the simplest example.
What damage can be expected from a player, who wields a 100 damage weapon and has Hrimsorrow Gloves and Hatred (20% of physical damage added as cold damage)? Is 25% of the physical damage first converted to cold damage, then hatred is applied to the remaining 75 physical damage? => 25 cold from conversion + 75 phys. + 15 added cold or is it the other way round? => 20 added cold + 25 cold from conversion + 75 phys. edit: I found someone who claims to know it: http://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/1b7pws/ek_damage_conversion/c94eew4 " I emphasized the part that seems to be wrong, though. Last edited by CadEx#6497 on Apr 30, 2013, 3:24:53 PM
|
|
|
"I emphasized the part that seems to be wrong, though."
Fairly obviously a typo; he sums it up as 45 Cold, which is the correct value. A practical example with fictional numbers: 20% of Physical added as Cold 25% Converted to Cold 75% Increased Physical 50% Increased Cold 50% More Physical damage 100 Base Physical damage 50 Base Cold damage Damage-based-On is checked first: 100 * 0.20 = 20 Cold damage Conversion: 100 - (100 * 0.25) = 75 Physical Damage 100 * 0.25 = 25 Cold damage We now deal 75 Physical, 20 Cold (based on Physical), 25 Cold (converted from Physical), and 50 Cold damage. Increased is applied: 75 * (1 + (75/100)) = 131.25 Physical damage Based-on and Converted damage benefits from the source damage bonuses as well. 20 * (1 + (50/100) + (75/100)) = 45 Cold damage 25 * (1 + (50/100) + (75/100)) = 56.25 Cold damage 50 * (1 + (50/100)) = 75 Cold damage More and Less are applied: 131.25 * (1 + (50/100)) = 196.875 Physical damage, rounds to 197 45 * (1 + (50/100)) = 67.5 Cold damage, rounds to 68 56.25 * (1 + (50/100)) = 84.375 Cold damage, rounds to 84 No multiplicatives for the flat Cold damage. Final damage numbers can be added together: 197 Physical damage, (68+84+75=) 227 Cold damage |
|
|
Thanks, that's comprehensive.
|
|
