Why are the changes to Berserk (support).. instead.. not it's own newly named support for rage?.
hi..
let me preface by saying.. i have never used the old berserk support, so my question is not coming from MY rage. :). after looking over the gem change announcement (book), and viewing the complete gutting of the previous berserk gem.. i was left with a post producing question of: why did the change made to berserk.. simply not become its own support gem? (i would have called it "ragequit support") i kid. and keep the existing berserk, just tone it down or give it some conditions for use? ie: "while you have endurance charges, 5% more movement speed and 10% less damage taken" "while you have frenzy charges, 5% more movement speed and 10% attack speed".. ect. instead you take a support gem that many players can use for various different specific or general reasons and gut it to a much smaller group that focuses rage. hell, even just adding a small % increased rage effect to a toned down (pre) existing rage support, would have been a better solution. decision could have been made to add increased rage effect and give every other existing gem attributes a flat level of 5% and that gem STILL would have been used by the same large group AND the rage builds. since when has it ever been a good balance decision to gut a gem so hard that it completely rewrites its identity. the changes to berserk should have simply been toned down or conditions added and the new changes to berserk should have been its own gem. just saying.. in a decade of playing this game.. this decision is just odd to me. all the best. ps. not complaining at all. but probably would be very upset if i actually used this support. Last bumped on Jul 23, 2024, 7:37:51 PM
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
![]() |