Change how trade returns results for normal vs transfigured gems

I have been trying to sell my level 21/20 "Tornado shot of Cloudburst" and I keep getting whispers thinking they are getting normal "Tornado Shot".
It is incredibly annoying to deal with, so for now i have de-listed it. Please put in some way for people to differentiate between the two when searching trade.
And yea, I know the players/buyers should be paying attention, but you would not believe the amount of whispers I have had in just 2 hours time.
I am sure TS is not the only case.

TLDR: If you search for a normal tornado shot on trade, it shows both normal and transfigured versions.

"

bluechimera wrote:

I have been trying to sell my level 21/20 "Tornado shot of Cloudburst" and I keep getting whispers thinking they are getting normal "Tornado Shot".
Please put in some way for people to differentiate between the two when searching trade.

There is a filter in the "Miscellaneous" section for "Transfigured Gem", which can be set to "Any" (default), "Yes", or "No".

Since there's already a way, the fault lies in the hands of people who aren't searching properly.

https://www.pathofexile.com/trade/search/Affliction/9YmPaMOHK

"

Jadian wrote:

"

bluechimera wrote:

I have been trying to sell my level 21/20 "Tornado shot of Cloudburst" and I keep getting whispers thinking they are getting normal "Tornado Shot".
Please put in some way for people to differentiate between the two when searching trade.

There is a filter in the "Miscellaneous" section for "Transfigured Gem", which can be set to "Any" (default), "Yes", or "No".

Since there's already a way, the fault lies in the hands of people who aren't searching properly.

https://www.pathofexile.com/trade/search/Affliction/9YmPaMOHK

This is extremely unfortunate for people who have similar issues with this :(

Perhaps GGG could default the field to "no"

I don't think its possible for this kind of fix...the "search" bar is always going to look for anything that matches all the words written. If it was more restrictive, it would be a LOT harder to use...

I also don't like the idea of changing any of the default settings from "any" because again that would restrict your search. Restricted searches should ALWAYS be at the discretion of the user, and not the system. Functionally, it is so much harder and less clear to UNrestrict a search, than it is to set limits.

I think its just a matter of learning the tool a bit better, but not that there is anything functionally "off".