Can we get essences in stacks of 10 already?
|
Who the heck thought stacks of 9 was a good idea? Trading essences is rough for those of us who are challenged with basic mathematics.
Last bumped on Jun 12, 2023, 11:25:13 AM
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
|
|
|
It's for easy trading to the vendor, but I agree, I would like it to be a stack of 10.
|
|
|
bump
|
|
|
+1
I usually sell them in bucks dividable by 9 just to avoid wasting my time doing math when trading them. A proper stack of 10 would be very handy when comes to pricing and trading. Exiles, pffff!
|
|
|
there is a reason its a multiple of 3, also there is a reaosn to it be a multiple of 10.
So they should make Essences stack of 30 mathematically speaking. |
|
|
So, what are the need to be multiple of 3?
Assuming that one is not a cheap and has "essence tab", the stack of 9 make no diference when upgrading essences. Exiles, pffff!
|
|
" Spoken like a true elitist... Fact is, the vendor recipe exists and is used by players who don't have an essence tab. Having stacks of 10 would make this so incredibly frustrating, far more than than the change from 9 to 10 would be for trading purposes...try for a second putting yourself in someone else's shoes and having to shift-click and remove 1 from every stack if you ever want to upgrade your essences... Also, why is there a need for it to be a "proper" stack of 10? For essences, the proper stack has ALWAYS been 9. 10 has no meaning for essences...they upgrade in 3s. 10 is a completely arbitrary number and has no connection for essences, trade or otherwise. Guess what? Stacks of 9 trade just as easily as stacks of 10... I agree with BlackDebera, no matter what the stack size should be divisible by 3. If they want to increase it, it definitely shouldn't be to 10 but rather to 15/18/21 etc. If the math was actually a problem, just price your essences in stacks of 9 with a nice round chaos price if you so choose. It's just as easy to sell essences in stacks of 10 than in stacks of 9 if you price them correctly for your own level of math ability... For example, the current poe ninja average value of one deafening anger is 3.4 c per. In a stack of 10 that works to be evenly 34c. In a stack of 9, that works to be 30.6 which is unwieldy....BUT no one is forcing you to sell it for that. Just make it 31 or 30. Just as even, just as easy as the stack of 10... Last edited by jsuslak313#7615 on Jun 10, 2023, 9:47:03 PM
|
|
" Spoken like a true Karl Marx. 1 - the reason to be stack of 10 is to make trade in bulk easier, or more natural, since our numeral system is based in 10, not 9. The rest of your arguments are poor. Like "this always has been". Recently, for instance, stack of chaos change to 20 and it always had been 10. So changes can happen. Also, there is other NPC trades that requires you to break stacks, so this is not a "can't do task". For last, call me elitist if you want. The true is one is very cheap if plays a game and don't contribute with any money to it, even so that GGG not only makes the game but also provide servers and maintenance, and yet, one's demand that game goes in his behalf instead of the ones that contribute to it*. Cheers, *note I am not talking about pay-to-win, which I don't support. Exiles, pffff! Last edited by TrunksD2#2172 on Jun 12, 2023, 5:03:41 PM
|
|
|
In case people don't know yet, other currencies like oils and catalysts don't have this problem. You just get the same item back if you don't have enough for 3. They should change the essence vendor recipe to be the same. So huge +1 BUMP for this thread.
 Last edited by Revnaut#0808 on Jun 12, 2023, 11:32:27 AM
|
|
