Iron rings

I think iron rings need to be buffed. Given the choice, I don't think anyone would choose 1-4 physical damage over some resistance, mana or life. I'm not saying a damage boost of 1-4 is useless; at the VERY beginning of the game it is useful. It does slowly become useless relative to other stats you can have on a ring.

Just ask yourself this: if you could craft the perfect ring, what prefix would you have on it? I bet the sheer majority of you would NOT make it an iron ring.

Anybody else feel the same or am I missing something?
As a Facebreaker user, I would definitely use Iron Rings if I ever found one with solid stats comparable to my current rings.
"
Acrosis wrote:
As a Facebreaker user, I would definitely use Iron Rings if I ever found one with solid stats comparable to my current rings.
You can just as easily find a Prismatic or Coral with a higher Phys Dmg roll than an Iron Ring.
EA IGN: We_Have_Monk_at_Home

*Burnt out and waiting for either PoE1 League or new PoE2 Classes.*
And is there a reason why I can't roll max physical damage on an Iron Ring? Didn't think so.
"
Serefkana wrote:
"
Acrosis wrote:
As a Facebreaker user, I would definitely use Iron Rings if I ever found one with solid stats comparable to my current rings.
You can just as easily find a Prismatic or Coral with a higher Phys Dmg roll than an Iron Ring.


You can also have a high phys dmg roll on an iron ring.

Why not both?
I'm in an abusive relationship with life. It keeps beating the hell out of me and I'm too cowardly to leave it.

IGN • NCPEREIRA
STEAM • steamcommunity.com/id/NCPereira
"
NCPereira wrote:
"
Serefkana wrote:
"
Acrosis wrote:
As a Facebreaker user, I would definitely use Iron Rings if I ever found one with solid stats comparable to my current rings.
You can just as easily find a Prismatic or Coral with a higher Phys Dmg roll than an Iron Ring.


You can also have a high phys dmg roll on an iron ring.

Why not both?
True, but I'd rather the defensive stats over 1-4Phys Dmg. Compared to the higher explicit phys dmg rolls, 1-4 seems insignificant imo..
EA IGN: We_Have_Monk_at_Home

*Burnt out and waiting for either PoE1 League or new PoE2 Classes.*
True you can roll physical damage on an iron ring but the sheer majority of people don't use Facebreakers. Sod's law that a minority spoke up before the rest. Even still, would you not agree that relative to other rings for the majority of the population, the iron ring is inferior?
I would change them to +X% to dual wield/twohand melee block chance.
It would really help a lot.
Right now only shields have good block chance, and its really hard to sustain survivability on melee.
I use iron rings, they add quite a lot of damage with all your +physical modifiers.
I think they do need a minor buff though. Maybe randomise them like other rings.
Minimum goes from 1 - 2 and maximum goes from 4 - 8. That alone would make them very viable.
As I understand it, except for Facebreaker scaling, the +Phys Dmg on Rings are unaffected by physical damage modifiers... At least that's what I heard.
EA IGN: We_Have_Monk_at_Home

*Burnt out and waiting for either PoE1 League or new PoE2 Classes.*

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info