Only 1 elemental unique claw in game??

Suddenly I found out that there's only 1 unique claw with 100+ elem. damage in PoE ! And it is not good for current meta because of leech is applied to ES. I think we need more elemental damage unique claws guys... seriously.
Last bumped on Dec 12, 2017, 5:52:12 PM
Or you could, you know, play outside of the current meta?
"
tornshoe wrote:
Or you could, you know, play outside of the current meta?


this has to be the least relevant post in the history of posts
I mean, he's complaining about the claw because it's not good for "the current meta", but sure dude.
"
tornshoe wrote:
I mean, he's complaining about the claw because it's not good for "the current meta", but sure dude.


no that's like, not at all what he's complaining about.

he's complaining about there only being one ele dmg claw in the game.

the fact that it also only works in off meta builds is just an icing on the cake.
"
shaunika90 wrote:
"
tornshoe wrote:
I mean, he's complaining about the claw because it's not good for "the current meta", but sure dude.


no that's like, not at all what he's complaining about.

he's complaining about there only being one ele dmg claw in the game.

the fact that it also only works in off meta builds is just an icing on the cake.

Exactly this ^
What about HOWA, HoTaM and Touch of Anguish?
Bird lover of Wraeclast
Las estrellas te iluminan - Hoy te sirven de guía
Te sientes tan fuerte que piensas - que nadie te puede tocar
"
Mikrotherion wrote:
What about HOWA, HoTaM and Touch of Anguish?

Touch of Anguish deals 0 elemental damage. HoWA and HoTaM both have only conditional elemental damage over 100. For that you need to stack int.
I think before we get more claws with added elemental damage we need more claws with added block chance.

There's only one.
"Let those with infinite free time pave the road with their corpses." - reboticon
"
tornshoe wrote:
Or you could, you know, play outside of the current meta?

+1
Why does one need unique claws, anyways? Aren't there enough rares?
Zaanus:
Global chat: Mechanics for A work one way, B for another, C for a third but also with A, B uses C but not A, and D uses A&B but not C

___
Isn't a "no" better than an ignore?

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info