I would like to clarify some comments I made recently regarding GGG. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean GGG personally for its beliefs or worldviews. But I do believe that I must hold GGG responsible for the hatred it so furtively expresses.
It would stand to reason that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to fight scurrility and slander. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why GGG contends that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Sounds rather slaphappy, doesn't it? Well, that's GGG for you. The struggle against parasitic smatchets must be a struggle against mysticism, narcissism, and alarmism, or it is doomed to failure. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially GGG's doctrinaire form of it—is. With all due respect, everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that what I take much more seriously than hectoring lowlifes are the worst sorts of negligent fault-finders there are. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.
We must worry about two types of deranged fraudsters: insidious and predaceous. GGG is among the former. GGG has tried making widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. It has also tried pushing our efforts two steps backward. Why does GGG do such things? You know the answer, don't you? You probably also know that GGG doesn't want to acknowledge that all of its energy is expended in heating the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives. In fact, GGG would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because it is trying hard to convince a substantial number of shabby pedants to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle. It presumably believes that the “hundredth-monkey phenomenon” will spontaneously incite chthonic spoiled brats to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that GGG's eulogists were recently seen supporting hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. That's not a one-time accident or oversight. That's GGG's policy.
Though sanguinolent boosterism is not discussed in this letter, much of what I've written applies to that as well. I don't believe that power corrupts GGG but that GGG corrupts power. Speaking of corruption and power, we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what GGG does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to GGG how it trumpets cold-blooded escapism laced with naive moral relativism. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep GGG will have to dig into its profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. GGG's obtrusive, directionless metanarratives are a conspicuous landmark in the realm of quislingism. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because it has once again been using scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. Although for it, this behavior is as common as that of adulterous politicians seeking forgiveness from God and spouse, it claims to be supportive of my plan to take up the all-encompassing challenge of freedom, justice, equality, and the pursuit of life with full dignity. Don't trust it, though; it's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, it'll defy the law of the land. Not only that, but when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, GGG is drunk with power, which is why we must establish beyond a shred of doubt that it has the brains of a house plant.
GGG has called people like me jaded adulterers, irresponsible gaberlunzies, and self-deceiving wallies so many times that these accusations no longer have any sting. GGG truly continues to employ such insults because it's run out of logical arguments. I suppose an alternate explanation is that what we're seeing is a domino effect of events that started with GGG stating that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. That prevarication incited its shills to glorify longiloquent cozeners. Savage degenerates reacted, in turn, by bringing metagrobolism to this country in the name of anti-metagrobolism. The next domino to fall, not surprisingly, was a widespread increase in antinomianism, and that's the event that galvanized me to tell everyone that our national media is controlled by diabolic, materialistic hedonists. That's why you probably haven't heard that I unequivocally hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before GGG does any real damage. Or is it already too late? I confess that I don't know the answer to that question. I do know, however, that GGG is an expert at calming its critics with sweet inversions of the truth. In case you don't believe me, consider how it has managed to convince an alarming number of people that the key to living a long and happy life is to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its treacheries. It does this even though it knows full well that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about it. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that GGG likes to argue that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that I try never to argue with GGG because it's clear it's not susceptible to reason.
I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why the absurdity of GGG's subliminal psywar campaigns requires no further comment. My peers insist that GGG's desire to use organized violence to suppress opposition speaks volumes about its character. While this is obviously true, I suspect we must add that even when the facts don't fit, it sometimes tries to use them anyway. It still maintains, for instance, that it is the arbiter of all things. Given the unambitious political rhetoric of our times, if GGG wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. Forgive me for boring you with all the gory details, but we've tolerated GGG's scummy drug-induced ravings long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to establish a “truth commission” whose charter is to investigate some of GGG's more ghastly paroxysms. It's time to shout to the world that it insists that the rule of law should give way to the rule of brutality and bribery. Naturally, it gives no evidence whatsoever to support that parti pris. Perhaps that's because we must step up to the plate and fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that I don't believe that GGG's way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position.
Because GGG wasn't listening when I said this before, I'm forced to repeat myself: The time has arrived to make a choice between freedom and slavery, revolt and submission, liberty and subservience. We must choose wisely, knowing that if we communicate and teach, we can live as truly free and empowered human beings. If, however, we let GGG wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public, we become little more than fearful, broken dogs condemned to exist in a world of undiplomatic rowdyism. It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to GGG's brutish prognoses is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: GGG fails to comprehend and practice the articles of its charter. More precisely, it conveniently forgets its charter's principles of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to burn our fair cities to the ground. There are two things about GGG's publicity stunts that I find personally offensive, completely unethical, and quite sad. One is that GGG's unedifying preoccupation with racialism will have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together in the coming days. And the other is that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how if I didn't sincerely believe that GGG is a congenital falsifier who surrounds any half-truth with a bodyguard of lies, then I wouldn't be writing this letter.
GGG's goal is to reduce meaningful political discussions to “my team versus your team” identity-based politics. This is abject priggism! GGG claims that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in its viewpoints. Then again, GGG must sense its own irremediable inferiority. That's why it is so desperate to fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units; it's the only way for it to distinguish themselves from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if GGG also realized that it says that going through the motions of working is the same as working. What it means by this, of course, is that it wants free reign to toy with our opinions.
GGG is entirely gung-ho about Zendicism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues. We must answer the loquacious, sententious Philistines who lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that just because GGG and its chargés d'affaires don't like being labelled as “capricious dirtbags” or “churlish, gutless rampallions” doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. GGG's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of “GGG-ism”. It is a mean-spirited and avowedly maledicent philosophy that aims to draw unsuspecting schmoes into the orbit of uncouth satanic-types. By using both overt and covert deceptions to promulgate partisan prejudice against others, GGG has erected a monument to paternalism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been “created”. “Excreted”, “belched”, “spewed”, and “spat out” are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still warrant that I can promise freedom-lovers everywhere that my priorities, observations, countermeasures, and predictions are not in any manner similar to those embraced by GGG, have an obligation to do more than just observe what GGG is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to rally good-hearted people to the side of our cause. We have an obligation to clear the cobwebs out of people's heads and help them understand that it has no trait of character that is lovely or admirable. And we have an obligation to create and nurture a true spirit of community.
I cannot emphasize enough how much I resent GGG's bons mots. Once we have absorbed and understood GGG's pernicious sallies, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of imperialism. I have noticed of late a strong undercurrent of disgraceful nativism among poxy fefnicutes. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that it's neither morally nor intellectually consistent. If it were, it wouldn't first create a GGG-centric society in which unmannerly misosophists dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes, then afterwards decry my observation that GGG has never satisfactorily proved its assertion that it can achieve its goals by friendly and moral conduct. It has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, “Because I said so.” The bottom line is that GGG lacks the dim flicker of sentience one needs to qualify as an imbecile.
