Guild Ranks

I am the GM for KoA (Knights of Armageddon) I currently have 44 members and 33 guild tabs in my guild and constantly adding new members if they meet the qualifications. I would like to propose more ranks be added to guilds as keeping all the new members at the same rank as the other members is just awful and I would like to give promotions where they are due. without having all the members as officers. I currently have 2 outstanding officers that have their own personal guild stash tabs and do not want promotions to conflict with what they are comfortable putting into their tabs. but I do not want to keep everyone else at the low end of the totem as recruit ranks.
░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░█░░█░█░░░░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀█░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀█░█▄░░█░
░█▄▄▄░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░█░░█░█▄▄▄░░░░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄█░░░█░░░█▄▄█░█░█░█░
░░░░█░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░█░░░█░░░█░░█░█░░██░
░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░▀░░░▀░░░▀░░▀░▀░░░▀░
This thread has been automatically archived. Replies are disabled.
All you need is people that have access and people that dont. Members and officers is just fine.
"
All you need is people that have access and people that dont. Members and officers is just fine.


No, members and officers only is not fine. I don't care how others want to run their guilds but in my experience with people joining guilds is that their has to be some incentive within the guild and staying at recruit rank is not incentive. Additional ranks need to be added.
░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░█░░█░█░░░░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀█░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀█░█▄░░█░
░█▄▄▄░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░█░░█░█▄▄▄░░░░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄█░░░█░░░█▄▄█░█░█░█░
░░░░█░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░█░░░█░░░█░░█░█░░██░
░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░▀░░░▀░░░▀░░▀░▀░░░▀░
I don't really see a downside to this request, so why not?
"
"
All you need is people that have access and people that dont. Members and officers is just fine.


No, members and officers only is not fine. I don't care how others want to run their guilds but in my experience with people joining guilds is that their has to be some incentive within the guild and staying at recruit rank is not incentive. Additional ranks need to be added.


We cant even play together in a guild. You can have 6 in a party and guilds are cross league. You can have members in all leagues and even SF players. No need for being anything but a member or officer. members are not low rank, theyre just that, members.
"
2ofSpades wrote:
I don't really see a downside to this request, so why not?


there is no downside to this request at all. it will improve the overall guild gameplay as well, whereas in the future it will be possible to set certain ranks to be able to set up guild events or maybe even Guild vs Guild PvP or Capture the Flag events. there are many mechanics that can be added to guilds that will not effect the gameplay at all. but will overall improve the guilds. and the idea of building more socialism within the game.
░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░█░░█░█░░░░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀█░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀█░█▄░░█░
░█▄▄▄░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░█░░█░█▄▄▄░░░░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄█░░░█░░░█▄▄█░█░█░█░
░░░░█░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░█░░░█░░░█░░█░█░░██░
░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░▀░░░▀░░░▀░░▀░▀░░░▀░
"
"
"
All you need is people that have access and people that dont. Members and officers is just fine.


No, members and officers only is not fine. I don't care how others want to run their guilds but in my experience with people joining guilds is that their has to be some incentive within the guild and staying at recruit rank is not incentive. Additional ranks need to be added.


We cant even play together in a guild. You can have 6 in a party and guilds are cross league. You can have members in all leagues and even SF players. No need for being anything but a member or officer. members are not low rank, theyre just that, members.


the idea that you are commenting on anything to do with guilds is beyond me as you are probably not part of a guild or maybe you run your own and you think that you are not equal to the rest of your members. if this is the case I am sure any members within your guild will not be sticking around for very long. I talk with all my guildies on a daily basis. I help them if it is needed and they help me. that is what a guild should be. not one person benefiting from everyone else.

"you are probably not part of a guild" I am to assume I am correct and your comments are just to boost your post count as if it really matters
░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░█░░█░█░░░░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀█░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀█░█▄░░█░
░█▄▄▄░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░█░░█░█▄▄▄░░░░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄█░░░█░░░█▄▄█░█░█░█░
░░░░█░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░█░░░█░░░█░░█░█░░██░
░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░▀░░░▀░░░▀░░▀░▀░░░▀░
Last edited by S0S on Feb 7, 2014, 2:33:45 PM
"
"
"


No, members and officers only is not fine. I don't care how others want to run their guilds but in my experience with people joining guilds is that their has to be some incentive within the guild and staying at recruit rank is not incentive. Additional ranks need to be added.


We cant even play together in a guild. You can have 6 in a party and guilds are cross league. You can have members in all leagues and even SF players. No need for being anything but a member or officer. members are not low rank, theyre just that, members.


the idea that you are commenting on anything to do with guilds is beyond me as you are probably not part of a guild or maybe you run your own and you think that you are not equal to the rest of your members. if this is the case I am sure any members within your guild will not be sticking around for very long. I talk with all my guildies on a daily basis. I help them if it is needed and they help me. that is what a guild should be. not one person benefiting from everyone else.

"you are probably not part of a guild" I am to assume I am correct and your comments are just to boost your post count as if it really matters


Dont antagonize me.

What does it matter whether i am in a guild or not? I dont care what you do in your guild, i think its not necessary to split guild members into more ranks.
go back to posting your random pictures. if you are not part of a guild or unaware how guilds are run then your commentary is not needed nor is it welcomed. Their is no need for you to troll this topic to boost your post count
░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░█░░█░█░░░░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀█░█▀▀▀░░░░░█▀▀▀░█▀▀█░▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀█░█▄░░█░
░█▄▄▄░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░█▄▄▄░░░░░█░░█░█▄▄▄░░░░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄█░░░█░░░█▄▄█░█░█░█░
░░░░█░█░░█░█░░█░█░░░░░░░█░░░░░█░░█░█░░░░░░░░░░░█░█░░█░░░█░░░█░░█░█░░██░
░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░▀▀▀▀░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░░░░░░░▀▀▀▀░▀░░▀░░░▀░░░▀░░▀░▀░░░▀░
"
No, members and officers only is not fine. I don't care how others want to run their guilds but in my experience with people joining guilds is that their has to be some incentive within the guild and staying at recruit rank is not incentive. Additional ranks need to be added.


I agree. Additional ranks that one could attain would promote member involvement.
The chance to Vaal +1% maximum resists on an amulet is less than 1/300.

Report Forum Post

Report Account:

Report Type

Additional Info