General Discussion - Price check Bringer of rain - Forum

" topcatti wrote: What? Unless you have "godly" rolled helmet and armor you basicly dont lose any armor. Some junk I found recently in Catacombs Add common 1.5K armour chest... Last edited by dima_dunedin on May 23, 2013, 11:56:13 AM	Posted by dima_dunedin on May 23, 2013, 11:55:12 AM Quote this Post
" dima_dunedin wrote: " PabloCappone wrote: read man... have 3 sup so with 4l.. = 7L .... so lol(?) 3 sups, yes. But something tells me you will do much better with 6L and 2 sups of your own choice Also those gems are limited to level 18 also those gems can t be upgraded. Also abyssus do more damages with a chest. Forum pvp	Posted by lolozori on May 23, 2013, 11:56:33 AM Quote this Post
" boof wrote: Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports? thats the most important question dear mate... Wise words buff -> balance <- nerf , need to happen , deal with it	Posted by PabloCappone on May 23, 2013, 11:56:46 AM Alpha Member Quote this Post
" PabloCappone wrote: " boof wrote: Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports? thats the most important question dear mate... Well jump on in game and test it!	Posted by boof on May 23, 2013, 12:02:18 PM Quote this Post
" boof wrote: " PabloCappone wrote: " boof wrote: Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports? thats the most important question dear mate... Well jump on in game and test it! They don't. At least not with Rime Gaze. No. Calm down. Learn to enjoy losing.	Posted by b15h09 on May 23, 2013, 12:03:35 PM Quote this Post
" boof wrote: What the fucking fuck???? edit: oh can't use chest armor, just saw that. Was about to lose it for a minute there. Still epic. Kaom's is still more OP than what that helmet would have been without the "no chest" clause. This message was delivered by GGG defence force.	Posted by mazul on May 23, 2013, 12:08:50 PM Quote this Post
I do agree this is an interesting piece of equipment, but as usual for PoE uniques it can be easily beaten by good rares. Which are maybe more rare than uniques on the other side Last edited by dima_dunedin on May 23, 2013, 12:10:17 PM	Posted by dima_dunedin on May 23, 2013, 12:09:51 PM Quote this Post
" dima_dunedin wrote: I do agree this is an interesting piece of equipment, but as usual for PoE uniques it can be easily beaten by good rares. Which are maybe more rare than uniques on the other side If the game was perfectly designed then the best rares should beat the best uniques for every slot. Kaom's is the big exception to this rule, and it is hard to also beat Lioneye's. This message was delivered by GGG defence force.	Posted by mazul on May 23, 2013, 12:19:43 PM Quote this Post
" mazul wrote: If the game was perfectly designed then the best rares should beat the best uniques for every slot. Why?	Posted by dima_dunedin on May 23, 2013, 1:16:43 PM Quote this Post
[mod edit: removed] Last edited by Henry_GGG on May 23, 2013, 2:56:23 PM	Posted by narg62 on May 23, 2013, 1:29:52 PM Quote this Post