Avatar of fire + occulist noteables?
Ok, so basically.
Avatar of fire - 50% Phys/lightning/cold converted to fire dmg and deal no non-fire damage. There are two occulist noteables. Profane bloom - Cursed enemies you kill have a 20% chance to explode, dealing a quarter of their max life as chaos dmg. Malediction - For each curse killed on an enemy, gain 4% of non-chaos damage as extra chaos damage for 4 seconds. Question is does these noteables work with avatar of fire? Last edited by Buiaka on Jun 30, 2016, 7:11:31 PM Last bumped on Jul 1, 2016, 10:04:03 AM
| |
If chaos damage was fire damage, then yes it would work.
However, Chaos damage is non-fire damage. So, it won't work. Face it, all of your suggestions are worse than this idea: http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/657756 Last edited by dudiobugtron on Jun 30, 2016, 6:11:17 PM
|
|
I would guess that bloom would work because it's not you doing the damage. I would guess that malediction does not work.
| |
" Yeah, that seems reasonable. I guess the effect of an atziri's promise would mimic the effect on malediction pretty accruately. I just tested and it does not increase your damage. | |
" It is you dealing Damage though. You cause 'em to explode, its your Damage. | |
Afraid so.
| |
It still looks cool though, so there's that.
|
|
GGG, please "fix" this :D
The ascendant occulist gets "20% increased Damage if you've Killed a Cursed Enemy Recently", i'd much rather have a similair effect. | |
I sure hope they don't.
A, because the last thing the game needs is more scion. More importantly, though, because 20% increase is basically nothing in the grand scheme of things. Killing an enemy with just 2 curses with a witch, however, potentially grants you 8% MORE damage if you deal no chaos damage currently. That is significant. It's also a class based on chaos damage and ES, for AoF, I reckon Elementalist would be a lot more fitting. Zaanus:
Global chat: Mechanics for A work one way, B for another, C for a third but also with A, B uses C but not A, and D uses A&B but not C ___ Isn't a "no" better than an ignore? |
|