How did players go bankrupt mapping again?

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Isn't it obvious that as long as maps are pure RNG some people will get royally fucked while others will get rewarded like kings. The bad thing is that we talk about content here. Its like throwing the dice if you are able to continue to play or if u have to buy maps or stop playing.

And all the stupid argument for it are just straw men. If sustainable maps reward to much exp the lower the xp reward. If we get to rich running maps then lower the drop rats but at LEAST LET US PLAY FFS
There are people who are getting richer by playing maps so the money influx is not an argument. Reduce the RNG and spread the incume of the few lucky over many and you will not hear no criticism from people running out of maps because there would be none.

"

Lordofthedreadz wrote:

When people will realize they run T9-T11 twice (if not more) as fast as T12+ maps they can understand that XP in T12+ maps is overated.

I personally see T12+ map as the cherry on teh cake I try to roll them well with pack size and stuff but I get my XP from T9 - T11 and it works fine.

I have about 20 T12+ maps lying in my stash and I run one when I feel like I want the fun / challeneg, otherwise I'm pretty happy with my T9-T11...

"

khemintiri wrote:

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Isn't it obvious that as long as maps are pure RNG some people will get royally fucked while others will get rewarded like kings. The bad thing is that we talk about content here. Its like throwing the dice if you are able to continue to play or if u have to buy maps or stop playing.

And all the stupid argument for it are just straw men. If sustainable maps reward to much exp the lower the xp reward. If we get to rich running maps then lower the drop rats but at LEAST LET US PLAY FFS
There are people who are getting richer by playing maps so the money influx is not an argument. Reduce the RNG and spread the incume of the few lucky over many and you will not hear no criticism from people running out of maps because there would be none.

Thing is if you have played since the beginning of maps in the game you will have seen a trend to give away higher level maps , if i dont remember incorrectly the highest level of maps by then was lvl 76(or 77).

high level maps like that was really rare though , not something you got as easy as you get them today. Getting stuck on lvl 72 maps was pretty common, and it was a hard grind to get higher maps.

Almost every half a year they increase the drop rate , for now getting lvl 75-78 maps is really is , they drop a lot and you can even buy them from zana .

So from my perspective the maps are abundant nowadays , and when i think back i think its a lot of people being spoiled believing it should be easier to gain xp then it is.

Seeing 69 people at lvl 100 , is almost mind blowing , back when it actually was hard to get xp maybe 1-5 got lvl 100 in a temp league , if even that many.

TLDR ; it's easy enough to get maps and xp nowadays, even with bad rng.

"

restinpieces0815 wrote:

Isn't it obvious that as long as maps are pure RNG some people will get royally fucked while others will get rewarded like kings. The bad thing is that we talk about content here. Its like throwing the dice if you are able to continue to play or if u have to buy maps or stop playing.

"

Weren't you begging for a free Bino's like a few weeks ago?