Donald Trump
" Trump is the enemy of Russia's enemy : Isis. Trump is the enemy of Isis' sugar momma - Hillary. Hillary - is the enabler of Isis, and played a very large part in creating the terrorist free for all across the middle east. Why would Russia want to see the same woman who helped create the current violent mess in office? Why would anyone with any real common sense want this dangerous and incompetent former secretary of state in office? PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910
| |
" What the DNC did to Bernie was dispicable. The GOP treated Trump no better, and I think that speaks volumes about how the current establishment cronies view these two candidates. " The complete disregard for security and protocol that Hillary displayed in running official state department business on her private server, doesn't give me any confidence that the DNC's security practices were any better. I don't think Russia needed much effort to "Hack" into the info, and I would guess that almost every nation with any real espionage team would have a lot of information that they shouldn't have on our government. We could point some fingers at the various Federal agencies and the huge security breaches they have had, but the impetus to actually make security important has to come from somewhere higher up. If anything, Hillary has shown us that she would weaken that security if it impeded her, or might mean a permanent record that she could be held accountable for. She's made some very bad decisions throughout her career. As bombastic as Trump is, he still seems more of a compromiser to me, the same way Bill Clinton was a compromiser, and I think this would enable both sides of the aisle to get something they want out of legislative packages. PoE Origins - Piety's story http://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2081910 Last edited by DalaiLama on Jul 28, 2016, 5:07:29 AM
| |
.
Last edited by Entropic_Fire on Oct 26, 2016, 9:18:40 PM
|
|
" Comey's presser. And I'll have to refer back to my last post about getting caught up in the laughable purely media-driven framing of 'Trump's treasonous remarks'. We're going to call that one sentence treasonous, but not our Sec. St. knowingly and willingly punting on security measures with documents classified at the highest possible level of top secret? We're gonna be outraged over the former given this juxtaposition? Really? If you want to attack Trump, idk why people aren't going after his lines of "the Geneva Conventions are the problem" "we're gonna do waterboarding; we're gonna bring back worse than waterboarding" "we're gonna torture - even if it doesn't work" "we're gonna go after the families of ISIS" I mean there is a whole catalogue of legitimate attacks to make against this guy. Choosing to try and spin "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing." into actual treason seems like a real missed opportunity. |
|
.
Last edited by Entropic_Fire on Oct 26, 2016, 9:19:54 PM
|
|
" A quote from this article on CNN: " Point is wouldn't be surprised if they did pop up. Last edited by GeorgAnatoly on Jul 28, 2016, 10:13:15 AM
|
|
Hillary for prison, this Fall ;)
Prepare the popcorn, beer and butthurt lube*. This election will be epic. *(only if you are SJW) When night falls
She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness | |
.
Last edited by Entropic_Fire on Oct 26, 2016, 9:20:17 PM
|
|
From FBI report on Clinton's private server:
" When night falls
She cloaks the world In impenetrable darkness | |
isn't her real name 'killary' since she ordered world wide terrorist attacks with drones over her private phone?
saddam couldn't have done it better. age and treachery will triumph over youth and skill!
|