SRS - added fire or melee splash?

"

SkyCore wrote:

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

"

SkyCore wrote:

added fire is straight up weaker than melee physical damage, faster attacks, and spell echo. Increased duration or faster casting is also better in most situations.

What does any of that have to do with the question of Added Fire vs. Melee Splash? Did you read the OP or the subsequent responses?

So if you ask how to build the best bow and i give ya plans for a laser you would be upset?

"

SkyCore wrote:

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

"

SkyCore wrote:

added fire is straight up weaker than melee physical damage, faster attacks, and spell echo. Increased duration or faster casting is also better in most situations.

What does any of that have to do with the question of Added Fire vs. Melee Splash? Did you read the OP or the subsequent responses?

So if you ask how to build the best bow and i give ya plans for a laser you would be upset?

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

Non sequitur.

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

The OP specifically asked about Added Fire vs Melee Splash, leading one to the conclusion that they already know all the non-disputed gem links and that conclusion is further corroborated by the entirety of their post and everyone's responses. You then listed, literally, every other gem selection as though you were revealing the secrets of the Universe... none of which was in question.

A better analogy would be if he had all the pieces to build a bow and was torn between which cams make the bow better and wanted to know why people prefer one size over another. Then, you list off all the parts of the bow that are already being used, except the cams, and act as though you said something useful.

And now comes your indignant response which employs what you assume is profundity incarnate but is actually nothing more than a perfect example of the unlearned self-righteousness so endemic to the populous of today... that I will summarily ignore.

Good day, sir.

"

SkyCore wrote:

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

Non sequitur.

Just because the logic is not apparent to you does not mean i had no logical basis for my statement. There is an implicit sense that the OP plans on using SRS and is limited in the number of links available.

"

Xero_Kill wrote:

The OP specifically asked about Added Fire vs Melee Splash, leading one to the conclusion that they already know all the non-disputed gem links and that conclusion is further corroborated by the entirety of their post and everyone's responses. You then listed, literally, every other gem selection as though you were revealing the secrets of the Universe... none of which was in question.

A better analogy would be if he had all the pieces to build a bow and was torn between which cams make the bow better and wanted to know why people prefer one size over another. Then, you list off all the parts of the bow that are already being used, except the cams, and act as though you said something useful.

And now comes your indignant response which employs what you assume is profundity incarnate but is actually nothing more than a perfect example of the unlearned self-righteousness so endemic to the populous of today... that I will summarily ignore.

Good day, sir.

I assure everyone, there was no harm intended. I used my time to assist others and this is how im repayed? With asinine comments.

Your sentences are neatly strung together with obvious superior thesaurus use. But the underlying motivations and logic beneath them are extremely flawed. I can only assume what you say is merely a pretense in order to attack me without provocation. If not, i would suggest you seek professional help.

Furthermore, you do not rule over me. I am not your slave, your subject, or your child. I am not bound to follow your expectations. Indeed it is you which are bound by the forum rules and need to be brought to your knees for violating the 'do not antagonize' guidelines. If you cannot peacefully coexist with me here, you will be banned.